Browse by Category

Archives

This Pre-War 3-Bedroom Overlooking Lincoln Park Is Still Available: 2130 N. Lincoln Park West

We last chattered about this 3-bedroom vintage unit at 2130 N. Lincoln Park West in east Lincoln Park in March 2012.

See our prior chatter here.

Most of you thought it was a beautiful apartment even if the layout was not to your liking.  Some of you thought this might sell in the $600,000s and others thought in the mid- $700,000s.

If you recall, it has nearly all the features buyers look for, but can rarely find, in a vintage unit.

It has a washer/dryer in the unit and attached heated garage parking. The one amenity it is missing is central air.

The unit even has a private elevator entry and a private 660 square foot terrace, which is unique for these pre-war buildings along the park.

Built in 1927, the unit has a 38 foot barrel vaulted gallery and oak floors.

The listing says the kitchen is 3 years old. It has white cabinets, granite counter tops and stainless steel appliances.

The listing also says the bathrooms are “new.”

Unit #3S, one floor above, was also recently on the market. It had the same layout but no outdoor terrace.

It just sold on June 20, 2012 for $750,000.

Will this unit sell for the same?

Jennifer Lea at Dream Town still has the listing. See the pictures, the virtual tour and the floorplan here.

Unit #2S: 3 bedrooms, 3 baths, 2400 square feet

  • Sold in February 2000 for $480,000
  • Originally listed in January 2012 for $895,000
  • Reduced
  • Was listed in March 2012 at $849,500
  • Reduced in April 2012 to $825,000
  • Currently still listed at $825,000
  • Assessments of $1443 a month (includes heat, parking, cable)
  • Taxes of $10640
  • No central air- window units only
  • Washer/Dryer in the unit
  • Garage parking included
  • 600 square foot private terrace
  • Bedroom #1: 16×14
  • Bedroom #2: 16×11
  • Bedroom #3: 10×10
  • Gallery: 38×7

18 Comments

  1. Dan #2 (July 3, 2012, 2:30 pm)

    What a beautiful vintage condo. The main disappointment is that it’s on the second floor, which would be a big issue for me – because if I buy in a high-rise, I want views – but probably not for a lot of people. The monthly fees seem very reasonable for a building like this, especially considering they include parking.

    I have no idea if the price is right, but the fact that a comparable went for under 800 means this one will probably have to go lower, even with the outdoor terrace. I just can’t imagine using it. There would be limited sun thanks to the surrounding buildings, and you’d feel like a bug in a magnifying glass with all those windows staring down at you.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  2. Brady (July 3, 2012, 2:31 pm)

    Thumbs up for including a nice pdf floor plan, but wow, that is a strange layout.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 2 votes)
  3. Dan #2 (July 3, 2012, 2:35 pm)

    Looks like 16-S is on the market as well. They’re asking $100 K more. To me, the view would be worth it. However, the listing has no photos, which raises my eyebrows.

    http://www.urbanrealestate.com/property/2130-N-Lincoln-Park-West-Unit-16-S-CHICAGO-IL-60614-4KJZ363L4A6SC.html

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  4. mh (July 3, 2012, 2:47 pm)

    “you’d feel like a bug in a magnifying glass with all those windows staring down at you”

    That terrace is just crying out for some super bizarre / inappropriate behavior to scandalize the neighbors. Like a naked yoga class or something.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +4 (from 6 votes)
  5. anonny (July 3, 2012, 2:50 pm)

    I’ll basically affirm my sentiments from the prior chatter:

    “The unit directly above, #3S, just hit the market at $779k. It doesn’t have a huge private terrace like #2S (which is indeed a rare thing for a LPW/Lakeview Ave building), and the ‘bedroom’ off of the living room is used as a family/t.v. room, but it’s overall a nicer looking unit. The third floor of the building has beautiful, arched windows in front, the kitchen in #3S looks nicer, and it’s simply one floor higher, which makes for a nicer view of the park/trees and reduced noise.

    As I said above, these half-floor ’3 bed’ units in this building are well-suited (long term) to one child families. And #3S really drives that fact home, as these places, with their lovely gallery halls, shouldn’t have a t.v. in the main living room, but should instead place it in a French-doored room off of the living room, as #3S has done. And having purchased it for $660k four years ago, I’d bet one could close #3S for $700k, tops. Has to have #2S very, very concerned.”

    Congrats to both the sellers and buyers of #3S. I’m a little bit surprised that it closed at so close to the ask, but all things considered, it’s pretty much impossible to find a true comp for #3S for less than $750k. Anything even close to a comp, unit-wise, is going to be a co-op, which means higher fees and a much larger down payment. Some one-kid family or empty nesters now have a lovely place.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)
  6. Dan #2 (July 3, 2012, 2:53 pm)

    This is the kind of place my wife and I are thinking about for once the kids are grown up and paid for. In other words – looking 10 years down the road.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: -1 (from 3 votes)
  7. benjamon9 (July 3, 2012, 4:27 pm)

    If 3S went for $750k, I doubt the terrace is worth $75k. I would bet someone that didn’t see 3S which anonny says was nicer will be willing to pay $775k or so for this unit with the terrace, but I think it won’t go higher meaning this probably needs a price cut to $799k to attract a buyer.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  8. Laura Louzader (July 3, 2012, 4:49 pm)

    The assessments are extremely reasonable for a vintage unit this size, with a large outdoor space of its own, no less.

    But I doubt it will get the asking price, given what comparable units are selling for. $750K feels about right.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 2 votes)
  9. Dan #2 (July 3, 2012, 4:54 pm)

    Brady,

    Not sure what you see about the layout that’s strange. Indeed, this sort of layout is quite typical for vintage high-rise apartment buildings built in the 1920s. I’ve been in an apartment at the 16-story 415 W. Aldine, and the 3 BR layout is basically the same as this one (a much cheaper building, too. A similar unit there would go for around $300K).

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
  10. housing bear (July 3, 2012, 6:09 pm)

    Sold in February 2000 for $480,000

    enough said. what did they gut rehab this place? i dont think so

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 4 votes)
  11. Jp3 (July 3, 2012, 7:44 pm)

    Wonder if the 3s buyer also made an offer on 2s or if they just preferred the unit they purchased.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 2 votes)
  12. Artlover (July 4, 2012, 11:28 am)

    Everybody is complaining the $825K price is too high but just remember that everyone offers less than the asking price and is met somewhere in between. A 5% price reduction puts it at $784.000 which is a totally reasonable price for this place.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +1 (from 3 votes)
  13. benjamon9 (July 4, 2012, 4:08 pm)

    Artlover, I think it is a more psychological price point. People will say $800k is my absolute top limit and therefor not look at a place listed at $825 or even $805 even though they probably should. If it were reduced to $799k I bet it would garner more attention.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  14. danny (lower case D) (July 5, 2012, 10:51 pm)

    After the past few days of insane heat, I would NEVER consider an house/condo without central AC.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  15. vlajos (July 5, 2012, 10:55 pm)

    Danny, would you consider a place that you can install a/c?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  16. danny (lower case D) (July 5, 2012, 11:01 pm)

    vlajos… I would consider a SFH where one could install a central AC utilizing existing ductwork.

    I don’t think it would be possible for a vintage highrise unit like this one.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  17. vlajos (July 5, 2012, 11:04 pm)

    How about a sfh where you can install space pak?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  18. Margo (July 10, 2012, 9:01 am)

    The assessments are “reasonable” until capital improvements are needed.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *