The Affordable Budlong Woods Townhouse Reduces $110K: 5252 N. Rockwell

We last chattered about this 3-bedroom townhouse at 5252 N. Rockwell in Budlong Woods in January 2010.

5252-n-rockwell-approved.jpg

See our prior chatter and pictures here.

It was withdrawn from the market but has since come back on and it looks as if it is now a short sale.

The townhouse has been reduced $110,200.

It has a fenced back yard and parking.

Yes, that is pink carpet but that is a cosmetic change.

The townhouse also does not have central air- but only window units.

With the price now approaching the 1995 purchase price, is this now a deal?

5252-n-rockwell-living-room-approved.jpg

5252-n-rockwell-backyard-approved.jpg

Ifeta Faye Redzovic at First Gold Realty (which, in the listing, says she is a certified short sale professional) has the listing. See the pictures here.

5252 N. Rockwell: 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, 1232 square feet, assigned parking

  • Sold in August 1991 for $114,000
  • Sold in October 1995 for $120,000
  • Originally listed in May 2009 for $279,900
  • Reduced
  • Was listed in January 2010 at $269,900
  • Withdrawn
  • Re-listed in August 2010 for $199,700
  • Reduced several times
  • Now a short sale???
  • Currently listed at $159,700
  • Taxes of $2734
  • No assessments
  • No central air- window units
  • Finished basement
  • Bedroom #1: 12×11
  • Bedroom #2: 10×10
  • Bedroom #3: 12×11

20 Responses to “The Affordable Budlong Woods Townhouse Reduces $110K: 5252 N. Rockwell”

  1. Looks like public housing.

    $0.00

    0
    0
  2. Looks like something from Villa Park… hmmmm $3?

    0
    0
  3. Not even public housing has carpeting that painful to the eye. Ouch.

    But that said, good grief – this is really cheap.

    0
    0
  4. It always strikes me as unusual to see a hole in the brick for a windows AC unit.

    0
    0
  5. has that low level Cocaine dealer look to it.
    That place could actually be converted to an amazing minimalist dream pad

    0
    0
  6. The exterior makes me feel very sad.

    The interior can be changed and the rooms look fairly large. I don’t think I could get past the exterior though.

    0
    0
  7. GHET-TO.

    0
    0
  8. Come on guys – the place is priced for what it is!! What do you expect for 160k? A mansion?

    0
    0
  9. couldn’t pay me to live here

    0
    0
  10. This would be a perfect project for a show like Sell This House.

    0
    0
  11. U G L Y this place has no alabi. Its ugly, its ugly yeeech!

    0
    0
  12. It would rent for about $900 a month and should be priced accordingly.

    0
    0
  13. A very good price for a mid-century modern. Refreshing to not hear about “stainless steel and black granite.” A very workable, affordable property.

    0
    0
  14. typicalcribchattercontributer on September 25th, 2010 at 10:51 pm

    Not close enough to an el stop for me.

    0
    0
  15. Not my definition of Mid century modern!

    0
    0
  16. This is a solidly-built mid-century modern collectivist townhouse. For an urban hipster-parent who likes Korean barebeque and karaoke bars, who can bike down to Brown or Red Lines, this is a deal. It could be renovated via Home Depot into a very decent place. What you save in housing costs, you can afford to send your kids to Montesori school in Bowmanville five minutes away. Look at the yard; you can grow your own vegetables and keep chickens.

    0
    0
  17. “Not close enough to an el stop for me.”

    So, your legs are as short as Groove’s?

    Half a block to the 11, 6 minutes to the Brown Line. Or an easy 20 minute walk.

    0
    0
  18. Also: “It would rent for about $900 a month and should be priced accordingly.”

    This *is* priced according to a sub-$1k rental equivalent. 5.25 cap, about, which is above the cost of funds for this size loan for an o/o.

    0
    0
  19. I think this townhouse is located near the ca. 2000 condo conversions on Farragut and other east-west streets, just west of Western and north of Foster. The units were really nice “starter” homes, but a number of them are now in foreclosure/short-sale.

    I know it’s an apples/oranges situation, but the condo situation nearby may have a negative impact on the desirability of the townhouse.

    0
    0
  20. Sold for 150K on 1/21/2011. I’d call that a steal.

    0
    0

Leave a Reply