What Would You Pay For A Bank Owned 2/2 With Parking In Old Town? 1309 N. Wells

This 2-bedroom in 1309 N. Wells in Old Town has been on the market since October 2012.

It had previously been on and off the market since 2008 (!) but never sold.

It is now bank owned.

At 1100 square feet, it has oak hardwood floors and a fireplace.

The kitchen has white cabinets, counter tops and appliances. It is also still enclosed. I have seen renovated units bust out the wall with the living room to open it up more to the living space.

It also has the features buyers look for but normally can’t find in this price range in the heart of Old Town: central air, in-unit washer/dryer and garage parking.

It came on the market well above the 2006 purchase price but there were no takers.

It recently was reduced 10.8% to just $500 under the 2006 price at $329,500.

Is this even much of a deal at the 2006 price?

Adam Wavronek at Domain Realty has the listing. See the pictures here.

  • Sold in April 1997 for $145,000
  • Sold in December 2000 for $242,000
  • Sold in November 2004 for $292,000
  • Sold in June 2006 for $330,000
  • Lis pendens foreclosure filed in October 2009
  • Bank owned in July 2012
  • Fannie Mae Homepath property
  • Originally listed in October 2012 for $369,500
  • Reduced
  • Currently listed at $329,500
  • Assessments of $402 a month (includes doorman)
  • Taxes of $3697
  • Central Air
  • Washer/Dryer in the unit
  • Parking included
  • Bedroom #1: 15×10
  • Bedroom #2: 13×10

The Flippers Are Back! Yay! 2550 N. Lakeview In Lincoln Park

If there is any doubt that the real estate market has changed in 2012, look no further than this story from Crain’s about 2 different flippers in the new construction luxury high rise at 2550 N. Lakeview in Lincoln Park.

We’ve seen plenty of “renovators” or “rehabbers” in the past couple of years.

Those are investors who are taking beaten up properties, usually foreclosures, and rehabbing them and putting them back on the market for profit.

But flippers are different.

Flippers buy new construction properties at pre-construction prices, wait for the building to be built and for there to be appreciation, and then sell the units at a profit to new buyers without any rehabbing or renovating.

According to Crain’s, there are two flippers looking to sell units, in bulk, in the new high rise.

The investor has hired @properties agent Tricia Fox to sell purchase contracts for the 15 condos and 30 parking spaces at Lincoln Park 2550 even before closing on them. To sweeten the deal, the investor, whose identity could not be determined, also is offering to pay property taxes and assessments for a year after the sale.

“There are plenty of people looking to tie up capital right now, and there’s limited inventory,” Ms. Fox said.

The client isn’t the only investor trying to cash out. Another undisclosed buyer also wants to sell a portfolio of one-bedroom units in an “investor blowout” at the tower, according to marketing materials from Coldwell Banker agents Elena Frankel and Patrick Santry, who are handling the sale. The agents did not return messages.

The building has 218 units.

Crain’s is reporting that the developer has said he has contracts on half the units.

According to the MLS, there have actually only been 25 closings. Appraisal Research said 43 have closed. Some units may be slow in actually being put into the MLS as having closed.

There are apparently 67 units under contract.

All of these units the flippers are trying to sell therefore make up a big chunk of the units under contract in the building which have not closed yet.

Ms. Fox declined to say what her client has agreed to pay for the condos and parking spaces but said the contracts were signed before construction began. Asking prices have since risen at the project, allowing the investor to price the portfolio at $700,000 per unit, or 30 percent below current listings marketed by Ricker-Murphy, Ms. Fox said.

That price undercuts the developer, which had sold just 43 units in the tower by the end of the third quarter, according to a report from Chicago-based consulting firm Appraisal Research Counselors. Another 67 units were under contract at the end of the quarter, the report said. Asking prices for the developer’s units at the tower range from $465,560 to nearly $11.5 million.

Ricker-Murphy co-principal John Murphy declined to comment through a spokesman.

Because Ms. Fox’s client would assign the purchase contracts rather than sell real estate, the investor would not have to pay transfer taxes and other closing costs. That discount allows her client to sell at a modest gain, Ms. Fox said.

“The seller is not planning to lose money, but they’re motivated to sell at a reasonable price and not make a killing,” she said.

Ms. Fox declined to disclose the makeup of the portfolio but said the units are “smaller rather than larger,” with a mix of west and east-looking views. A potential buyer could rent out the units at projected monthly rents between $2,500 and $3,200, she said.

Ms. Fox said her client aims to sell its contracts before the end of the year.

“From the time this building started marketing until now, we’ve certainly seen a lot of shifts in the marketplace,” Ms. Fox said. “The time is right for my client to let go.”

Asking price for the 15 units?

$10.5 million.

With a time table of the end of the year, this flipper has only 4 weeks to sell $10.5 million worth of luxury apartments.

Will it happen?

There are so many other questions- where does one begin?

  1. With investors apparently buying luxury units in bulk, will 2550 N. Lakeview simply become a very nice rental tower?
  2. If these flippers succeed, will flippers show up in The Ritz and other buildings?
  3. Are flippers a sign that the condo market is “back”?
  4. Is there really “limited inventory” when inventory in the upper bracket, once the Ritz comes on the market, is multiple years? Or is “limited inventory” referring to rentals and investment properties?
  5. Is this even a successful investment for someone renting out these units at only $2500 to $3200 a month? (I’m assuming they’re 1-bedrooms at that price because the 2-bedroom units are already renting in this building for $4000 and up.)

Questions, questions, questions…

Investor looks to flip 15 units at Lincoln Park 2550 [Crain’s Chicago Business, David Lee Matthews, November 29, 2012]

3-Bedroom Irving Park House On A Double Lot Sells For About 33% Under The 2006 Price: 3902 N. Central Park

We chattered about this 3-bedroom vintage house at 3902 N. Central Park in Irving Park several times over the years as it has been on and off the market since 2009.

See our June 2012 chatter here.

In June, after several more price reductions, we chattered about how low the price would go before it finally sold.

Listed at $635,000, Laura guessed it would sell at $575,000.

The rest of you chattered about the nearby public schools.

Laura was right on. It recently sold for $565,000.

If you recall, the house was built in 1914 and is on a double lot measuring 50×124.

2 of the 3 bedrooms were on the second floor with the third in the lower level along with an office and a great room. The bedrooms also had ensuite baths.

The kitchen had cherry cabinets, stainless steel appliances and granite counter tops.

The house had central air and a 2-car garage.

Did someone get a deal?

Elizabeth Bleeker at Prudential Rubloff had the listing. You can still see pictures here.

3902 N. Central Park: 3 bedrooms, 3.5 baths, 3370 square feet, 2 car garage

  • Sold in October 1988 for $70,000
  • Sold in June 1998 for $222,000
  • Sold in December 2006 for $850,000
  • Originally listed in September 2009 for $849,900
  • Reduced
  • Was listed in November 2011 at $650,000
  • Reduced
  • Was listed in June 2012 at $635,000
  • Sold in November 2012 for $565,000
  • Taxes of $5040
  • Central Air
  • Bedroom #1: 18×13 (second floor)
  • Bedroom #2: 14×12 (second floor)
  • Bedroom #3: 12×9 (lower level)
  • Office: 11×11 (lower level)
  • Great room: 18×12 (lower level)

 

Renovations Aren’t Just Happening On The North Side: 2354 S. Oakley In Pilsen

Three units in this 1924 building at 2354 S. Oakley in Pilsen came on the market in October 2012.

This building has been completely renovated and is now being called the “Oakley 23.”

Built in 1924, it has 9 units with 6 different floorplans.

They are all 2/2 units and range in price from $225,000 to $275,000.

Here are the units currently on the market:

  1. Unit #E: 2 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1300 square feet, $225,000- first floor
  2. Unit #C2: 2 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1000 square feet, $250,000
  3. Unit #A3: 2 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1350 square feet, $275,000

Outdoor parking is available for $7500.

Each of the units has central air and washer/dryer in the unit.

It has 10- 11 foot ceilings and 7 feet tall windows.

The kitchen cabinets are 42 inch Euro flat cabinets. There are granite counter tops and stainless steel appliances.

It doesn’t appear that any vintage interior features have survived the renovation.

With its proximity to downtown and a burgeoning restaurant scene, is Pilsen set to be one of the neighborhoods that comes roaring out of the bust?

Sophia Klopas and Jason Straton at Koenig & Strey Real Living are handling the sales.

You can check out more pictures, floorplans and pricing at the website for Oakley 23 here.

Who Will Be Affected By The “Obamacare Tax” In 2013? 1548 N. Hoyne In Wicker Park

This 2-bedroom at 1548 N. Hoyne in Wicker Park has been on and off the market since 2010.

It recently came back on the market again and the listing says:

“FULL PRICE ONLY! Sale must close by 12/31/12 why, because next day 3.8% Obamacare tax starts and capital gains tax could go up 13%. If buyer wants to pay, close whenever.”

This is the first time I’ve seen a mention of the 3.8% Obamacare tax in a real estate listing.

For those unfamiliar, Obamacare does have a 3.8% medicare tax on investment income which starts in 2013. But it only applies to the following:

  • Couples who make more than $250,000 a year
  • Individuals who make more than $200,000 a year

Additionally, for couples, the first $500,000 of profit is exempt. For singles, the first $250,000 of profit is exempt.

The exemption is NOT what you sell the property at. It is the profit from the sale.

This building was built in 1999 and has 4 units.

The listing also says that there will be $30,000 worth of work done to the exterior this spring.

I haven’t been able to locate any interior pictures of the unit but it does have central air, washer/dryer in the unit and one parking space.

Will this be the only time we see the Obamacare Medicare tax mentioned in an actual listing?

Jeffery Baker at Direct Access Realty has the listing. See the listing here.

Unit #2: 2 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1250 square feet

  • Sold in January 2000 for $316,000
  • Originally listed in 2010 for $384,900
  • Reduced numerous times
  • Was listed in March 2011 at $339,500
  • Was listed in October 2012 at $355,000
  • Reduced
  • Currently listed at $337,500
  • Assessments of $126 a month
  • Taxes of $4553
  • Central Air
  • Washer/Dryer in the unit
  • Assigned parking include
  • Bedroom #1: 15×13
  • Bedroom #2: 12×10

 

The Former Ballroom In The Commodore Sells For 39% Under The 2001 Price : 550 W. Surf In Lakeview

We last chattered about this 2-bedroom penthouse in The Commodore at 550 W. Surf in Lakeview in May 2012.

See our prior chatter here.

While many of you thought the decorating was a little dated, for the space and that it had 2 deeded parking spaces in that location, you all thought the list price of $624,900 seemed pretty reasonable.

The unit sold in September 2012 for $570,000.

If you recall, this building, and the unit, have quite a history.

The living/dining room was the old ballroom. Here’s a tidbit from the Upper Bracket column in the Chicago Tribune from 2003.

On the sixth and top floor of the Commodore building, 550 W. Surf St., which was built in 1898, the two-bedroom unit was partly created from a ballroom, which, according to legend, was used by Al Capone as a speakeasy during the 1920s, said co-listing agents Monique Crossan and Heather Bilandic of Sudler.

The ballroom has been converted into a living room and dining room combo, with 13-foot ceilings, three exposures, a recessed movie screen and a fireplace.

According to the Upper Bracket, the unit had been renovated by the 2001 buyer.

The kitchen had stainless steel appliances and granite counter tops with a skylight.

There were two bedroom suites and a large storage unit in the basement measuring 26×9.

The unit had the features that buyers looked for including in-unit washer/dryer, central air and 2 car deeded covered parking.

Did someone get a deal for the square footage?

Sheila Dietz at @Properties had the listing. You can still see the pictures here.

Unit #609: 2 bedrooms, 2 baths, 3000 square feet, 2 deeded covered parking spots

  • Sold in June 1993 for $223,000
  • Sold in July 1997 for $340,000
  • Sold in March 1999 for $425,000
  • Sold in June 2001 for $975,000
  • Sold in October 2006 for $999,000
  • Originally listed in July 2011 for $975,000
  • Reduced numerous times
  • Was listed in May 2012 at $624,900
  • Sold in September 2012 for $570,000
  • Assessments of $1151 a month (includes cable)
  • Taxes of $10,009
  • Central Air
  • Washer/Dryer in the unit
  • Gas fireplace
  • Storage: 26×9 (in basement)
  • Bedroom #1: 18×14
  • Bedroom #2: 17×12
  • Living room: 43×23

 

This Bank Owned 4-Bedroom Is Listed 35% Off The 2005 Price: 1601 S. State In The South Loop

This 4-bedroom single floor unit at 1601 S. State in the South Loop has been on the market since August 2012.

It is bank owned.

At 4500 square feet, it has as much square footage as a larger single family home in the neighborhood.

It has hardwood floors in the main living areas.

The kitchen has maple cabinets, some stainless steel appliances and granite counter tops.

It appears to have one car parking.

There is a fireplace, central air and washer/dryer hook-ups in the unit.

It’s been reduced almost $100,000 since it came on the market in August 2012.

The unit is now listed for about 35% under the 2005 price.

Is this a deal?

Ayoub Rabah at Great Street Properties has the listing. See the pictures here.

Unit #7E: 4 bedrooms, 3.5 baths, 4500 square feet, 1 car parking

  • Sold in November 2005 for $1,061,000
  • Lis pendens foreclosure filed in January 2009
  • Lis pendens foreclosure filed in August 2009
  • Bank owned in March 2012
  • Originally listed in August 2012 for $787,050
  • Reduced several times
  • Currently listed for $689,900
  • Assessments of $1300 a month (includes cable)
  • Taxes of $18,178
  • Central Air
  • Washer/Dryer hook-ups in the unit
  • Bedroom #1: 14×14
  • Bedroom #2: 12×12
  • Bedroom #3: 12×10
  • Bedroom #4: 12×10

2-Bedroom Duplex Up Loft Has Reduced $125,000 Since September: 360 W. Illinois In River North

We last chattered about this 2-bedroom duplex up loft in The Sexton at 360 W. Illinois in River North in October 2012.

See our prior chatter here.

In the fall, many of you thought it was overpriced for the condition of the unit.

Back then, it was listed at $549,000 but it has since been reduced to $450,000, including a $49,000 reduction just this week.

If you remember, it has high timber ceilings, exposed brick and large industrial windows.

The loft has one bedroom on the main level and the second bedroom on the second level, along with a private terrace.

It looks like this unit still has the original kitchen from when these were converted, with black appliances and “corian-like” counter tops.

The unit faces north.

The loft has all the other features buyers look for including central air, washer/dryer in the unit and garage parking.

Has the price come down far enough where someone will now bite?

Barbara Sapstein at Baird & Warner still has the listing. See the pictures here.

Unit #626: 2 bedrooms, 2 baths, no square footage listed, duplex

  • Sold in February 2000 for $320,000
  • Originally listed in September 2012 for $575,000
  • Reduced
  • Was listed in October 2012 for $549,000 (parking included)
  • Reduced
  • Currently listed at $450,000 (parking included)
  • Assessments of $675 a month (includes doorman)
  • Taxes of $5753
  • Chandelier excluded
  • Central Air
  • Washer/Dryer in the unit
  • Bedroom #1: 22×13 (second floor)
  • Bedroom #2: 11×12 (main floor)

If Inventory Is Low, Can You Re-List For A Higher Price? 612 W. Surf In Lakeview

This 3-bedroom top floor unit at 612 W. Surf in Lakeview has been on the market since March 2012.

At 1800 square feet, the listing says it has new baths and new windows.

The unit has 10 foot ceilings but few other vintage characteristics.

The kitchen has stainless steel appliances and granite counter tops.

The unit has the features buyers look for including central air, washer/dryer in the unit and parking.

Originally listed in March 2012 for $417,000 it dropped as low as $377,000 in September 2012 before it was withdrawn.

If the building looks familiar it’s because we chattered about the sister unit 612 W. Surf #4B in May 2012.

See our chatter here.

#4B sold in August for $420,000.

Recently, this unit came back on the market for $62,000 more than its September list price at $439,000.

After not selling for $377,000 in the fall, will it suddenly sell for more this winter?

Hugo Gaicia at Home First Realty has the listing. See the pictures here.

Unit #4A: 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1800 square feet

  • Sold in June 1995 for $177,000
  • Sold in June 1998 for $249,000
  • Sold in September 2010  for $340,000
  • Originally listed in March 2012 for $417,000
  • Reduced several times
  • Was listed in September 2012 at $377,000
  • Withdrawn
  • Re-listed in November 2012 at $439,000
  • Assessments of $295 a month
  • Taxes of $5699
  • Central Air
  • Washer/Dryer in the unit
  • 1 car parking
  • Bedroom #1: 13×13
  • Bedroom #2: 17×10
  • Bedroom #3: 13×11
  • Laundry: 12×6

 

 

Market Conditions: Condo Construction Perks Up But Are We Celebrating Too Soon?

Small condo developments are selling out across the North Side of the city. And they are selling out the units quickly.

But no one is saying that the era of new large scale condo towers is coming back any time soon.

“It will be a very long time before you see a high-rise tower,” says Mr. Ruttenberg, founder of Belgravia Group Ltd. “Whatever you see built will be small in size and extremely specialized.”

With the condo glut disappearing and much of the financial mess cleaned up, a few new projects are sprouting downtown and in the neighborhoods, like the first crocuses after a harsh winter. In another encouraging sign, some downtown developers who rented unsold condos as a survival strategy a couple of years ago are putting them back up for sale—and people are buying them.

If optimism has yet to return, rising sales and stabilized prices for existing condos have purged much of the pessimism from the market. Yet a full recovery is still years away, condo experts say.

The market will cross a key hurdle when developers start converting entire apartment buildings into condos, a possibility that’s hard to fathom today considering the strength of the rental market. In the meantime, builders will have to think in the dozens of units, not the hundreds.

“They’re taking baby steps,” says Gail Lissner, vice president at Appraisal Research Counselors, a Chicago-based consulting firm. “This is where the recovery begins.”

Some developers who were stuck with condos in the bust have even begun re-listing them.

While sales by developers have yet to rebound, the condo glut has shrunk in part because many unsold units have been rented out. Developers were sitting on 1,113 unsold condos in the third quarter, down from a peak of 8,222 in 2008, according to Appraisal Research.

Some developers are confident enough about the market that they have put their unsold condos back on the market after renting them out during the bust. The developer of One Place Condominiums, a 96-unit project in the South Loop, stopped renewing leases and sold 12 condos in the third quarter, the sixth-highest total for all active downtown projects, according to Appraisal Research. A developer’s representative did not return phone calls.

“When we see product coming back on the market,” says Ms. Lissner, “it’s an indication that the market is not oversupplied and that there is demand.”

There’s a lot of media buzz about the “recovery.”

But are we celebrating the demise of the bust too soon?

Why ‘small ball’ is a good sign in a condo development [Crain’s Chicago Business, Alby Gallun, November 26, 2012]