A 6-Bedroom Lakeview Mansion With 4-Car Garage for $6.28 Million at 2902 N. Burling

This 6-bedroom single family home at 2902 N. Burling in Lakeview came on the market in August 2020.

Built in 2019, this modern, contemporary home is on a double lot measuring 52×140.

The house has a brick, stucco, stone and limestone exterior and a professionally landscaped lot including mature trees.

It has heated double connected garages for 4 cars.

The house has some unique features, including a 5-level window wall and an elevator.

It has hardwood floors throughout.

There are 4 fireplaces.

The finishes are all done in the modern style including the kitchen which has luxury stainless steel appliances and an island, as well as a breakfast bar.

There’s also an attached breakfast room.

The primary suite is on the third floor and it has a massive master bathroom with a tub and shower that appears to measure about 31×9 as well as a huge walk-in-closet with built-in organizers that is 13×20.

3 of the other bedrooms are on the second floor.

The fifth bedroom is in the lower level along with the laundry room, the exercise room, the theater room and a second kitchen that is also outfitted with modern cabinets and a large island.

The sixth bedroom is on the third floor, along with the primary suite.

There’s a family room on the main level, off the kitchen.

Looking for a study? That’s on the third floor.

There’s also a game room on the second floor.

The house has a custom 12 foot chandelier.

Looking for outdoor space? It has 4 walk-out decks, including an outdoor kitchen.

One of the decks appears to be a rooftop deck, which has not been built out.

Listed in August 2020 at $6.28 million, it remains priced at $6.28 million.

In this hot housing market, will they get their price?

Linda Marcus at Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices has the listing. See the pictures and floor plans here.

2902 N. Burling: 6 bedrooms, 6 baths, 2 half baths, 10,500 square feet, single family home

  • I don’t know a prior sales price as it was new construction in 2019
  • Originally listed in August 2020 for $6.28 million
  • Currently still listed at $6.28 million
  • Taxes of $64,513
  • Central Air
  • Heated double connected garages for 4 cars
  • 4 fireplaces
  • Elevator
  • 4 decks
  • Outdoor kitchen
  • 12 foot chandelier
  • Bedroom #1: 17×18 (third floor)
  • Bedroom #2: 14×19 (second floor)
  • Bedroom #3: 17×17 (second floor)
  • Bedroom #4: 13×23 (second floor)
  • Bedroom #5: 16×20 (lower level)
  • Bedroom #6: 14×17 (third floor)
  • Living room: 17×18 (main floor)
  • Family room: 18×20 (main floor)
  • Dining room: 15×17 (main floor)
  • Kitchen: 16×17 (main floor)
  • Laundry room: 15×16 (lower level)
  • Breakfast room: 7×15 (main floor)
  • Study: 13×20 (third floor)
  • Game room: 20×33 (second floor)
  • Exercise room: 12×17 (lower level)
  • Theater room: 17×25 (lower level)
  • Second kitchen: 16×25 (lower level)

50 Responses to “A 6-Bedroom Lakeview Mansion With 4-Car Garage for $6.28 Million at 2902 N. Burling”

  1. A lot of coin and time spent to live somewhere for 2 years

    Nice place and looks well done, tho imo a bit unimpressive at +$6MM

    The horizontal FP are cheesy and not seeing how the glass wall isn’t covered in frost in the winter time

    0
    0
  2. Not my style at all, but it’s pretty great.

    Is the price right? I dunno, man, that’s so far outside my reach, it might as well be $600M.

    I would very much like to have that primary bath + walk in closet.

    0
    0
  3. You’d think they’d have more than an 8-top dining set up.

    Broker gets extra points though for the Air Force One shot.

    0
    0
  4. $6m+ and you still have 100s of thousands to spend on outfitting the roof decks??

    Foreclosure case filed in Dec-19. Lot was $1.4m in Feb-14, construction loan for $2.85m, increased to $3.5m, then $4m, then $4.35m.

    I think this (long) block of Burling is a nice little street, but it is 1,000% NOT what I think of when I think of locations for $3m+ homes, nevermind twice that.

    0
    0
  5. Now, THAT is a hood vent.

    But this is crib chatter so I have to complain about something: The primary kitchen island seating area sucks. Why the two level nonsense? The island in the basement kitchen is nicer.

    Head-scratcher that the roof deck was never done….I like the house well enough but cannot imagine who needs this…then again I will never have this kind of money. No views from any windows. Really don’t get it. The best part about this home in summer would be a really great roof deck….and a second outdoor kitchen up there.

    0
    0
  6. Arguably the same location but this one right on Wellington is definitely “less” desirable since it is closer to the hospital and related traffic…also in general I find the exterior on this one much less attractive and the interior is rather awful but that is mainly due to the current occupant’s stuff…
    https://www.redfin.com/IL/Chicago/1041-W-Wellington-Ave-60657/home/13364801
    Less than half the price! Agree with anon…doesn’t seem like a $6MM location. $4MM-$4.5MM tops.
    Also, on the Subject house the folks either never fully moved in or have already moved out…so they better start getting more realistic on price.

    0
    0
  7. At this price point and size, houses need two toilet rooms in the master bath.

    Hate all hallway offices. Once again, in such a huge house, why not hide the mess. Also, all this money and the new owner will still need to finish the rooftop deck. Ran out of funds?

    Why does the house need the tiny generator on the roof? I have never lost power in Chicago.

    0
    0
  8. At over 10k feet, it is indeed a huge home. However, I would have guessed it was worth closer to 3 million than 6 million. For 6 million, you have similar, amazing options in every city in America.

    0
    0
  9. “Less than half the price!”

    lot size is 37×122 versus 52×140

    0
    0
  10. “Head-scratcher that the roof deck was never done”

    Why drag people and food upstairs to entertain on the roof with no view when you have a lovely backyard and terrace right off the main living space?

    There’s a reason that people in the ‘burbs don’t have rooftop decks — it’s because they have yards and big decks that are convenient to access. Like this owner has.

    0
    0
  11. “Hate all hallway offices. Once again, in such a huge house, why not hide the mess. ”

    Agree that they don’t make sense for adults, but are good for monitoring teen and kid computer usage.

    0
    0
  12. “Why drag people and food upstairs to entertain on the roof”

    The elevator stops there–they designed the house to have a roof deck, but didn’t finish it. For $6m.

    In the 3d tour, you can see a major cock-up related to that: one of the drain vents is directly outside the door to the roof. What a buncha bozos!

    And, again, foreclosure suit pending from the construction lender.

    0
    0
  13. @kk, the other reason people in the burbs don’t have roof decks is because they don’t have views. IN an urban setting a roof deck gets you more privacy and potentially, views…Here, a roof deck seems like it would offer more privacy and feel like a get away as opposed to a boxed in yard ….boxed in by not the most attractive of surroundings (although I have seen far worse). Yes – – roof decks are a bit of work getting stuff up to them, but then again you can treat it as part of your workout plan or if you truly can afford the $6MM home, have the help bring it up.

    The true head-scratcher is if you are in this stratosphere of wealth, why not pick a better site and hire an architect to design something special with windows and landscaping that frame interesting things? This home was literally “kerplunked” on the site. Who was the builder? Are they currently in bankruptcy?

    0
    0
  14. pricesensitive on April 22nd, 2021 at 12:02 pm

    Id need to drink alot if I was dropping 6M on this and it has no bar that I see — didnt look that closely since its not really that interesting.

    0
    0
  15. A couple more of my favorite things:

    The stairs to nowhere, visible outside the lower level–I get that it’s egress, but huh?

    Who has a laundry room that big, and only set up for a single pair of machines? Bananas! (yes, it’s combo craft room, and there is another laundry room–don’t care! still bananas) And where’s the steam press machine?

    subzero mini-fridge in the nanny room.

    And the noted absence of a proper bar and really no where to put one.

    0
    0
  16. “And the noted absence of a proper bar and really no where to put one.”

    There is a HUGE bar in the basement rec room.

    0
    0
  17. The downstairs kitchen is essentially a bar, no? No cooktop?

    Yeah – – the longer you examine this specimen the more you understand the urge of the current occupants to skedaddle . . . unless they are also the developer/builder who is in bankruptcy and the asking price is based on a figure that solves a number of problems for them and not the market….

    “design build” is appropriate for formulaic structures for entities that have experience and on similar sites….no custom SFHs. Even the craphole condos that went up next to me had architectural plans and some details (that were only loosely adhered to during construction but that is another issue).

    Is there an architect out there willing to fess up to this place or is their side of the story that the builder ignored the details in the drawings?

    0
    0
  18. I agree with the comment about this stretch of Burling not being what one thinks of for a house this price.

    For the price, I’d rather have a house on Burling between Armitage and Willow. Narrower lots on some places but most of your neighbors are also in 3-4+ million dollar homes, if not more.

    https://www.realtor.com/realestateandhomes-detail/1905-N-Burling-St_Chicago_IL_60614_M77210-92936

    0
    0
  19. “There is a HUGE bar in the basement rec room.”

    Sure sure. doesn’t *feel* like a bar to me. A butler’s pantry is basically a bar, too, so there’s a reasonable argument that it has *two*.

    Of course, there’s little question that it *should* have an outdoor one someplace, too. At the ask, I’d expect K’zoo.

    0
    0
  20. Nice place but I’m sorry, for that price I would rather go for this IMO a better location too.

    https://www.redfin.com/IL/Chicago/643-W-Deming-Pl-60614/home/12584802

    0
    0
  21. or here if you are okay with less square footage

    https://www.redfin.com/IL/Chicago/538-W-Deming-Pl-60614/home/13366532

    up to you where/how you want to spend 6mil?

    0
    0
  22. “design build” is appropriate for formulaic structures for entities that have experience and on similar sites….no custom SFHs. Even the craphole condos that went up next to me had architectural plans and some details (that were only loosely adhered to during construction but that is another issue).

    Thats not what design-build is. Though the word gets thrown around so much nowadays its almost meaningless

    0
    0
  23. Groove’s suggestions reminded me of this one time CC headline:

    “Can You Sell a Single Family Home for Nearly $4 Million in Lakeview? 1010 W. George”

    And, to that, it’s still available, currently asking $3.7m:

    https://www.redfin.com/IL/Chicago/1010-W-George-St-60657/home/13363114

    0
    0
  24. A pox on these modern double-lot LP homes. Ruining the streetscape!

    0
    0
  25. Oh wait, it’s Lakeview. Well, same applies.

    And this is way too much to pay for the location.

    0
    0
  26. But anon(ufo), that place is hard to sell.

    I fell icky just looking at the front door pictures.

    0
    0
  27. But Groove, If I could turn back the hands of time, would that allow you to like the place?

    Or would it still be “Playa’s only”

    0
    0
  28. I like the place, just not the ghost inside it.

    Even if you could turn back the hands of time, the remix is always better.

    0
    0
  29. So, you’re afraid that if you were Home Alone in that place, you’d just thing about a Bad Man Bangin’ the Headboard?

    0
    0
  30. more afraid about all the closet’s.

    0
    0
  31. Yeah, he might be in one of them with Tom Cruise and John Travolta.

    0
    0
  32. I was meaning more as being trapped in it.

    0
    0
  33. So did I!

    https://southpark.cc.com/episodes/a3esfi/south-park-trapped-in-the-closet-season-9-ep-12

    0
    0
  34. Dangit, I never watched enough southpark to catch that. I am so watching that episode this weekend.

    0
    0
  35. Bankruptcy not foreclosure.

    0
    0
  36. seconded. Why would the prior comment on the financial condition of the contractor be deleted?

    It’s a Real Estate comment not some conspiracy rant. For anyone considering purchasing the property it’s pertinent

    thanks

    0
    0
  37. “seconded. Why would the prior comment on the financial condition of the contractor be deleted?”

    Because I’ve had prior issues with people attacking developers, realtors etc. over the years with no real facts.

    If you’re quoting something out of the media or a legal filing, then, fine.

    But otherwise, I will remove those comments.

    0
    0
  38. Sorry MZ. I’ve had issues in the past with people calling out homeowners, developers, realtors etc. with information that didn’t turn out to be correct so I will run a tight ship on that kind of thing being posted on the site.

    0
    0
  39. The information is publicly available in court filings Sabrina.

    I find it interesting that you would remove my factual comment (easily googled and verified) yet you will leave vile racist comments up. The double standard is a bit nauseating and makes me wonder what the actual motives are for selective comment deletions….

    0
    0
  40. “Bankruptcy not foreclosure.”

    Uh, no. Check Doc No 1934016094

    DEFINITELY foreclosure. Don’t know nuthin about bankruptcy.

    0
    0
  41. “I find it interesting that you would remove my factual comment (easily googled and verified) yet you will leave vile racist comments up. The double standard is a bit nauseating and makes me wonder what the actual motives are for selective comment deletions”

    MZ, my exact reasons I left the CC 6-7 years ago. It was maddening the logic, and like everything in my life if it looses enjoyment I get rid of it.

    0
    0
  42. “I find it interesting that you would remove my factual comment (easily googled and verified) yet you will leave vile racist comments up. The double standard is a bit nauseating and makes me wonder what the actual motives are for selective comment deletions”

    MZ, is your lawyer going to send me “cease and desist” threat letters?

    That’s all I’m going to say.

    I run the site. If you don’t like it, go chat somewhere else.

    And I rarely delete comments (other than HH’s who I always delete, and Bob the Bear who has been joining HH recently).

    But I will remove/edit them if you:

    1. Name the owners of the properties (unless it’s a celebrity and others are talking about the property)
    2. Talk about the interior furniture/personal items
    3. Disparage realtors or developers using non-public information

    0
    0
  43. “I run the site. If you don’t like it, go chat somewhere else.”

    Wow so indignant and boorish but thank you for that advice.

    0
    0
  44. Sabrina

    It is from a legal filing – It’s public information. you don’t even have to pay for the document

    CCrecorder CCCO document plainly lists: Murray Group and Republic Bank of Chicago.

    I wonder what additional papers I would need to sign given the legal status and the lis pendens

    0
    0
  45. sorry on that last part wasn’t clear. if i was buying this property and not paying cash, i wonder what other documents the bank would need me to sign as part of getting a mortgage given the lis pendens

    0
    0
  46. chichow: there’s a reason that the f/c info is still here. Unless/until that lis pendens gets released, the public record shows the land as subject to a f/c, and that’s not subject to dispute.

    There was a BK of a “Murray Group” entity, but (1) I can’t say it’s the same entity, and (2) the BK of the “Murray Group” entity was closed in 2019. So, even if it was the same entity (DUNNO!!), it is not currently in BK.

    0
    0
  47. @Groove77….dying laughing. Did you intentionally pick the 538 W Deming listing given the ahem….firm behind the reno (which apparently took all of 2016-2019 based on the google street view pics). I am sure the neighbors were thrilled with the four+ years of a construction dumpster in the road.

    Beautiful looking reno – – especially as compared to what a travesty that home was prior to 2016 (see old Redfin listing). I suspect this home belongs to someone at the firm? Clearly they put $$$ into it, but even if they put a cool million into it, they are looking to make over $1.0MM on it. I wonder if they will get it. If the adjacent building is rental and not condo I say no….but I definitely prefer 538 Deming to the Subject even though in general I prefer modern. This is an exception though – – it is quite beautiful and with an elevator, you could enjoy it until you are among the frail elderly. The chandelier looks to be missing quite a few pieces of cut glass though. kind of cracks me up. My parents home in Brooklyn had a very similar chandelier…but theirs wasn’t picked clean LOL.

    0
    0
  48. Sorry Cat, wasn’t an intentional pick. More a random what else you can get for the dollar in a better (close) location.

    0
    0
  49. This sold for $4,550,000

    https://www.realtor.com/realestateandhomes-detail/2904-N-Burling-St_Chicago_IL_60657_M88502-24732#photo4

    0
    0
  50. From the realtor link:

    1,218.84% More expensive than nearby properties

    And that barely paid the costs of construction (including carry, default interest, etc).

    0
    0

Leave a Reply