2-Bedroom Townhouse (Duplex?) on the Drive Now Just $290K: 3700 N. Lake Shore Drive in Lakeview

 

We last chattered about this 2-bedroom at 3700 N. Lake Shore Drive in Lakeview all the way back in December 2010.

See our prior chatter here.

The listing calls this a townhouse (as do all the listings for the other units in the complex) but some of you complained last time that it was nothing more than a duplex up condo.

Back in 2010, when it was listed at $350,000, a few of you thought that was a deal for the location even though the kitchen and most likely the baths were not updated.

But one person thought it would sell around $275,000.

After a $60,000 reduction, the unit is still available and now listed at $290,000.

If you recall, this is a southeast end unit which is on the top two floors. The listing says the balcony has tree top views.

Both bedrooms are on the top floor.

It has central air and the parking space is included.

As you can see from the pictures, the kitchen has not been updated. There are still no pictures of the baths.

How low will this go before it finally finds a buyer?

Could it go all the way back to the 1991 price?

Lydia Rudolph at Baird & Warner still has the listing. See the pictures here.

Unit #309: 2 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, 1 car parking, no square footage listed

  • Sold in September 1991 for $212,000
  • Originally listed in September 2010 for $350,000
  • Reduced
  • Currently listed at $290,000
  • Assessments of $500 a month
  • Taxes of $4722
  • Central Air
  • Washer/Dryer in the property
  • Parking included
  • Bedroom #1: 15×17 (4th floor)
  • Bedroom #2: 17×12 (4th floor)

3-Bedroom Rehabbed Bungalow Now Under $325,000: 4820 N. Tripp in Mayfair

We last chattered about this 3-bedroom bungalow at 4820 N. Tripp in the Mayfair neighborhood of Albany Park (is part of Mayfair also in Irving Park? I’m confused by Mayfair’s “true” boundaries) in July 2011.

See our prior chatter here.

Many of you were surprised to find you liked this bungalow but didn’t know much about the neighborhood.

The house is still on the market and has been reduced another $24,900 to $324,900.

If you recall, it was a foreclosure in 2009 and has since been rehabbed.  Someone posted a link last time to the rehabbers blog if you want to see the process. See that here.

The bungalow has been registered with the city’s Historic Bungalow Initative.

The listing says it has a new master bathroom.

The kitchen has cedar finished cabinets and stainless steel appliances.

2 of the bedrooms are on the main floor with the third in the basement along with the family room.

It has some of its vintage features intact such as built-in bookcases and stained glass windows.

Built in 1923 on a 30×125 lot, it has central air and a 2-car garage.

Mayfair was voted one of the best ”old house” neighborhoods in 2010 by This Old House magazine (51 neighborhoods were selected nation wide).

Will this house ultimately sell for under $300,000?

Edward Hester at Dream Town Realty has the listing. See the pictures here (the price in the listing is old so just ignore it.)

4820 N. Tripp: 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, 2000 square feet, 2 car garage

  • Sold in January 2002 for $211,000
  • Sold in October 2006 for $375,000
  • Lis pendens filed in September 2007
  • Bank owned in October 2008
  • Sold in February 2009 for $225,000
  • Originally listed in January 2011 for $369,900
  • Reduced
  • Was listed in July 2011 at $349,800
  • Reduced
  • Currently listed at $324,900
  • Taxes of $4717
  • Central Air
  • Bedroom #1: 12×10 (main floor)
  • Bedroom #2: 11×10 (main floor)
  • Bedroom #3: 15×11 (basement)
  • Family room: 21×20 (basement)

 

A “Completely Rehabbed” 4-Bedroom Victorian: 5723 W. Huron in Austin

This 4-bedroom Victorian single family home at 5723 W. Huron in Austin came on the market in November 2011.

The listing says it has been “completely rehabbed”.

It had been bank owned and had sold for just $21,500 in April 2011.

Built in 1897, the house is on a standard Chicago lot of 25×125.

It has hardwood floors throughout the main level.

There is a “gourmet kitchen” with cherry cabinets, granite counter tops and stainless steel appliances.

Three of the bedrooms are on the second level with the fourth and a family room on the third floor.

The listing says it has new siding, windows and a 2.5 car garage. The new A/C unit will be installed upon purchase.

Is this an attractive price for a “new” home in this neighborhood?

(I actually saw some home buyers looking at the bank owned house across the street while I was taking a picture of this house.)

Frank Montro at Oak Realty has the listing. See the pictures here.

5723 W. Huron: 4 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, 1872 square feet, 2.5 car garage

  • Sold in August 1989 for $10,000
  • Sold in February 2005 for $170,000
  • Lis pendens foreclosure filed in February 2010
  • Bank owned in February 2011
  • Listed in March 2011 for $22,500
  • Sold in April 2011 for $21,500
  • Originally listed in November 2011 for $184,900
  • Currently still listed for $184,900
  • Taxes of $2875
  • Central Air
  • Bedroom #1: 15×12 (second floor)
  • Bedroom #2: 13×12 (second floor)
  • Bedroom #3: 10×10 (second floor)
  • Bedroom #4: 14×12 (third floor)
  • Family room: 13×10 (third floor)

 

Trying to Sell a 3-Bedroom Duplex Up in West Town: 1702 W. Chicago

This 3-bedroom duplex up at 1702 W. Chicago in West Town has been on and off the market since April 2011.

In that time, the price has been lowered just $10,100.

At 1650 square feet, it has skyline views and 3 outdoor spaces.

The kitchen has granite counter tops, stainless steel appliances and maple cabinets.

Two of the bedrooms are on the main floor with the master on the second floor.

The unit has highly coveted 2-car parking, with one indoor space and one outdoor space.

It also has central air and in-unit washer/dryer.

While this unit is listed about $40,000 under the 2006 purchase price, it is still $48,400 above the 2003 price.

Before you get all up in arms about the price, Unit B in 1700 W. Chicago in the same building, which was 1900 square feet, sold just 5 months ago in September 2011 for $377,500.

Is this unit, even though it is smaller, fairly priced given the comps in the building?

Or has the market already changed in just those 5 months?

Austin Bader at Southport Sotheby’s has the listing. See the pictures here.

Unit #B: 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1650 square feet, 2 car parking

  • Sold in April 2003 for $326,500
  • Sold in January 2006 for $415,000
  • Originally listed in April 2011 for $385,000
  • Reduced
  • Currently listed for $374,900
  • Assessments of $275 a month
  • Taxes of $6058
  • Central Air
  • Washer/Dryer in the unit
  • Bedroom #1: 16×20 (second floor)
  • Bedroom #2: 12×13 (main level)
  • Bedroom #3: 13×16 (main level)

 

2-Bedroom Larchmont Loft With Parking Now $199,900: 1801 W. Larchmont in North Center

We last chattered about this 2-bedroom loft in the Larchmont Lofts at 1801 W. Larchmont in North Center in November 2011.

See our prior chatter here.

Back then, the loft was listed as a short sale at $225,000 which included the parking.

Several of you thought that wasn’t that bad of a deal considering #211, directly below it and with a similar layout, was purchased in October 2011 for $265,000 including the parking.

You can see the pictures of that loft here if you want to compare.

Some of you also wondered if the $225,000 had been “bank approved” and doubted whether it would sell for that low.

But since November, the loft has been reduced again to $199,900 (parking still included.)

If you recall, the loft has 12 foot concrete ceilings with some exposed brick. It is a south facing unit, so it is not facing either the Metra or the El directly (both of which run next to the building.)

The kitchen has white cabinets, stainless steel appliances and white counter tops.

It has the other features buyers look for including central air and washer/dryer in the unit.

How low will this go?

Robin Miner at @Properties still has the listing. See the pictures here.

Unit #311: 2 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1300 square feet

  • Sold in August 1996 for $140,000
  • Sold in July 1998 for $185,000
  • Sold in February 2007 for $317,000
  • Originally listed in April 2010 for $329,000
  • Reduced numerous times
  • Was a “short sale” in November 2011 at $225,000 (included the parking)
  • Reduced
  • Currently listed as a “short sale” for $199,900 (parking included)
  • Assessment of $273 a month (includes cable)
  • Taxes of $5315
  • Central Air
  • Washer/Dryer in the unit
  • Bedroom #1: 14×12
  • Bedroom #2: 14×10

Renovated Mayfair 6-Bedroom SFH Reduces $100K in Just 2 Weeks: 4626 N. Kilpatrick

This 6-bedroom single family home at 4626 N. Kilpatrick in the Mayfair neighborhood of Irving Park came on the market on January 11, 2012.

It was originally listed at $799,000 and has already reduced a couple of times down to $699,000.

Back in 2010, it was a bank owned 2-flat that was in the process of being converted into a single family home.

But from the look of the description and pictures of the house in this blog- it had a long way to go as far as repairs were concerned.

See the 2010 blog post here.

The old listing says the house was built in 1888.

It’s on an oversized 50×135 lot with a 2 car garage.

The kitchen sports white cabinets and SubZero appliances.

4 of the 6 bedrooms are on the second floor and the other two are on the third.

The house is located across the street from the Irish Heritage Center and has amazing freeway access literally a half block away. The blue line Montrose stop is also nearby.

Will this renovated house sell in the $600,000s in this neighborhood?

Erlend Candea at Dream Town has the listing. See the pictures here.

4626 N. Kilpatrick: 6 bedrooms, 3.5 baths, 7000 square feet, 2 car parking

  • Sold in February 1993 for $105,000
  • Lis pendens foreclosure filed in July 2009
  • Bank owned in June 2010
  • Listed in August 2010 for $209,900
  • Sold in November 2010 for $227,000
  • Originally listed on January 11, 2012 for $799,000
  • Reduced
  • Currently listed for $699,000
  • Taxes of $6037
  • Central Air
  • Bedroom #1: 21×14 (second floor)
  • Bedroom #2: 17×12 (second floor)
  • Bedroom #3: 14×14 (second floor)
  • Bedroom #4: 13×12 (second floor)
  • Bedroom #5: 25×20 (third floor)
  • Bedroom #6: 15×25 (third floor)

$170,000 Under the 2008 Price for This Millennium Park 3-Bedroom: 6 N. Michigan

There are several resales in this new(er) conversion building at 6 N. Michigan in the Loop including this 3-bedroom on the 6th floor.

Located across from Millennium Park, this unit is in the premier Southeast corner tier with direct views of the park and lake.

It has 10 foot ceilings.

The kitchen has walnut cabinets and SubZero and Bosch appliances.

It is lacking the interior details, like curtains, that Unit #803, which is also on the market two floors above it, have. But it is also the cheapest for sale in this tier.

At $905,000 (including one parking space), it is listed for $170,000 below the 2008 purchase price.

Millennium Park used to be a hot address.

Has the allure of living near Millennium Park faded in the last few years?

Kathleen Malone at @Properties has the listing. See the pictures here.

Unit #603: 3 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, 1979 square feet

  • Sold in November 2008 for $1,075,000 (included one parking spot)
  • Originally listed in November 2011 for $950,000
  • Reduced
  • Currently listed at $850,000 (plus $55,000 for parking)
  • Assessments of $1263 a month (includes a/c, doorman)
  • Taxes aren’t listed. The building has a historic tax freeze good only for the original buyer.
  • Central Air
  • Full laundry room
  • Bedroom #1: 17×13
  • Bedroom #2: 15×12
  • Bedroom #3: 12×10

 

Are Prices Still Falling for the 2/2s in One Museum Park? 1211 S. Prairie in the South Loop

By popular request, this 2-bedroom re-sale in One Museum Park at 1211 S. Prairie in the South Loop has been on the market since August 2011.

In that time, it has been reduced $50,000.

The listing says it has had $70,000 worth of upgrades in the kitchen and baths.

The kitchen has cherry cabinets, stainless steel appliances and granite counter tops.

There are cherry floors with a split floor plan.

It actually has a 7×7 den in the 1547 square feet, which appears to be a good space for an office.

The unit has Soldier Field, lake, Grant Park and city views.

This property is now listed $69,100 under the 2008 purchase price (if you include the parking).

Is this now a deal?

Patrick Santry at Coldwell Banker has the listing. See the pictures here.

Unit #2302: 2 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1547 square feet

  • Sold in May 2008 for $754,000 (I can’t tell if parking was included. It might have included 2 parking spots.)
  • Originally listed in August 2011 for $699,000
  • Reduced several times
  • Currently listed at $649,900 (plus $35,000 for parking)
  • Assessments of $692 a month (includes heat, a/c, pool, doorman, exercise room, clubhouse)
  • Taxes of $10,442
  • Central Air
  • Washer/Dryer in the unit
  • Bedroom #1: 15×13
  • Bedroom #2: 11×11
  • Den: 7×7

 

Looking for a 4-Bedroom Pre-War Beauty in Uptown? 4639 N. Beacon

This 4-bedroom top floor unit at 4639 N. Beacon in Uptown has been on the market nearly 2 years.

Built in 1915, it has most of its vintage features intact including built-ins in the living room and dining room along with a beamed ceiling and crown molding.

But it also has the modern conveniences buyers look for including air conditioning, in-unit washer/dryer and 2 car parking.

The unit has 2 large outdoor spaces and roof rights.

While the unit is technically a 4-bedroom, the fourth bedroom has been open to the kitchen so it is currently being used as a 3-bedroom.

The kitchen has maple cabinets, stainless steel appliances and granite counter tops.

First listed in April 2010, it has been reduced $69,100 in that time.

It is now listed for $30,100 under the 2002 purchase price.

What price will it take to finally sell this property?

Brad Lippitz at Prudential Rubloff has the listing. See the pictures here.

Unit #3: 4 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, 2100 square feet, 2 car parking

  • Sold in January 1998 for $332,000
  • Sold in October 1999 for $395,000
  • Sold in September 2002 for $480,000
  • Originally listed in April 2010 for $519,000
  • Reduced several times
  • Currently listed for $449,900
  • Assessments of $266 a month
  • Taxes of $6950
  • Central Air
  • Washer/dryer in the unit
  • Fireplace
  • Bedroom #1: 12×16
  • Bedroom #2: 11×11
  • Bedroom #3: 13×9
  • Bedroom #4: 12×9 (currently open to the kitchen)

 

Market Conditions: Condo Buildings Struggle to Get and Maintain FHA Approval

Just as credit remains tight, especially for new buyers who might not have a large downpayment, comes word that some condo buildings in Chicago are losing FHA eligibility and others that are applying for it are getting turned down.

From the Chicago Tribune:

Since Feb. 1, 2010, condo buyers haven’t been able to secure unit-by-unit “spot” approval for FHA-backed mortgages if an entire building was not certified. Instead, the federal government set criteria to determine the financial viability of an entire building before deeming the project as FHA-approved, even if it had previously been certified. An approval lasts two years.

The number of rejected buildings is adding up, due to bad paperwork and bad balance sheets as an increasing number of condo associations struggle with rentals, short sales and foreclosures. It is jeopardizing the plans of condo sellers who rely on the FHA’s stamp of approval as a marketing tool and condo buyers who either want or need an FHA-approved building.

Since Oct. 1, almost a quarter of the 206 Illinois condominium communities that have gone through the certification process have been rejected by the FHA. Those 48 buildings, which range from three-flats to high-rises, add up to 1,900 units in Chicago and its suburbs. The national rejection rate during the same time frame was 38 percent.

An additional 863 condo communities in Illinois, including 563 in Chicago, were approved by the FHA in 2010, but their certifications are set to expire this year.

So all those buildings that rushed to get certification a few years ago, now face the process again. Some will be able to pass, some will not.

That will obviously impact buyers decisions. And condo boards also have a decision to make because it isn’t cheap going through the certification process.

For buyers like Kristy Fender, of Chicago, FHA certification is a must-have on her list, and not just because it lets Fender and her fiance, Dan Harvey, make a smaller down payment on a home purchase. She also figures that in approving buildings the FHA is doing the due diligence that she would otherwise have to do.

But the process has been much more complicated than Fender imagined, and she’s wasted a fair amount of her time. During the past few months that she’s looked at units in Chicago’s South Loop, she’s incorrectly been told that a unit can get spot approval and has looked at units that were listed as FHA approved, only to find out the certification had expired. Her real estate agent, Bette Bleeker of Prudential Rubloff, wound up routinely checking property listings against the FHA’s website of approved buildings.

“It’s been very frustrating,” Fender said. “There’s a lot of wishy-washy information out there.”

Fender and her fiance now plan to made an offer on a South Loop condo, but the offer will be contingent on the association getting the building certified for FHA financing. Bleeker has spoken with the building’s management company.

A high number of renters in a building can doom an FHA application, which requires that a building must be more than 50% owner occupied.

Financially, the 249-unit condo building at 1620 S. Michigan Ave. in Chicago is stable, said condo board President Jeanette Johnson. Nevertheless, she worries that the building won’t pass the test when its certification expires next month because of the high number of renters residing in units.

“I’m anticipating that the board will try to do the recertification, but I don’t know if we’ll qualify,” she said. “We’ll need to evaluate that before we spend any money. It’s definitely on the radar screen.”

If the building doesn’t qualify, Johnson said, it’s likely the board would look to change its declarations and bylaws, itself a difficult and lengthy process, to gradually reduce the number of renters allowed in the building.

The Community Association Institute believes the FHA’s requirements are having a “chilling” effect on the market, and the trade group has asked for flexibility in the guidelines.

“When it comes to the condo market, that is the gateway to affordable housing, and FHA should play a critical role in that,” said Andrew Fortin, a vice president at the trade group.

Will lack of FHA certification put a damper on the condo market in 2012?

And is this just the beginning on even tighter standards for buyers once Freddie/Fannie are restructured?

FHA approval a certifiable problem [Chicago Tribune, Mary Ellen Podmolik, January 22, 2012]