Foreclosure Alert: Who Needs a Kitchen? 1620 S. Michigan in the South Loop

We’ve seen several condo units that have been missing their kitchens before.

This one at 1620 S. Michigan in the South Loop is not only missing the kitchen, but it looks like the toilet and bathroom sink is missing in at least one of the bathrooms as well.

1620-s-michigan-approved.jpg

But if a little renovation doesn’t scare you, is this a deal for a 2/2 with parking in the South Loop?

It is the cheapest 2/2 currently on the market in the building.

1620-s-michigan-_714-livingroom-approved.jpg

1620-s-michigan-_714-kitchen-approved.jpg

1620-s-michigan-_714-bathroom-approved.jpg

Henry Jones at Jones Realty Company has the listing. See more pictures here.

Unit #714: 2 bedrooms, 2 baths, no square footage listed

  • Sold in August 2006 for $329,000 (with the parking)
  • Bank owned as of April 2009
  • Listed in June 2009 for $260,900 (parking included)
  • Currently listed for $260,900 (parking included)
  • Assessments of $374 a month
  • Taxes of $4223
  • Central Air
  • Washer/Dryer hook-up in the unit
  • Bedroom #1: 13×10
  • Bedroom #2: 11×10
  • Living room: 15×13
  • Kitchen: 11×9
  • Den: 8×4

Market Conditions: Agents Warn of No Appreciation for the Last Four Years

The Chicago Tribune describes the increasing desperation of sellers as the middle of summer fast approaches and the window for selling is quickly closing (at least for selling during the “peak” selling season.)

It’s the middle of July, and home sellers are starting to feel the pressure.

Elmwood Park resident Dan Gongola is among them.

A month ago, he listed his gutted and rehabbed five-bedroom, four-bath octagonal bungalow for $549,900, almost $25,000 higher than his real estate agent advised.

“I said maybe I’d get lucky,” he said.

On July 2, with few showings to speak of, he chopped the price far below his agent’s original suggestion. The new price tag of $485,000 is a reduction of almost 12 percent from the list price.

Sellers are lowering prices- but how low are they going?

Some data off the MLS is misleading because a property can be cancelled and then re-listed and the listing history (days on the market and price reductions) wiped off of some of the “official” statistics.

As of Thursday, 31 percent of Chicago-area homes listed for sale had at least one price cut, compared with 29 percent of listings in June and 26 percent of listings in April, according to Trulia Inc., a San Francisco-based provider of real estate data. Nationally, 24 percent of homes on the market have had at least one price cut.

Drill deeper into the data, though, and that 31 percent local average is healthy compared with what’s going on in some neighborhoods. In the East Loop near Millennium Park, prices have been cut at least once on 43 percent of the listings, with an average reduction of 6.6 percent. In the sections of Lincoln Park and Logan Square that make up the 60614 ZIP code, 35 percent of the listings have price cuts, with an average reduction of 8.2 percent. In Elmwood Park, sellers have slashed, by an average of 9.6 percent, prices on 40 percent of the listings.

“Sellers say, ‘I’m not going to give it way,’ ” said Randy McGhee, an agent at Koenig & Strey GMAC Real Estate.

“If you want to sell, you will be giving it up for what you paid for it or less in the last four years. If you want to sell it and you’re thinking of a reduction, don’t wait until September. Do it now.”

But many other sellers are opting to try to rent out properties and wait for better market conditions.

“My last three buyers and a current one only want to see foreclosures and short sales because they believe that’s where the deals are,” said Kimberly Oehmke, an agent with @Properties.

“It’s hurting the person who has a great property and isn’t in the short sale-foreclosure predicament,” she said. “Anybody that is not a short sale, we just beg our clients to rent it out, just hold on until next year.”

Chicago housing prices drop even faster [Chicago Tribune, Mary Ellen Podmolik, July 13, 2009]

Short Sale Alert: 33% off Authentic Loft at 3201 N. Seminary in Lakeview

This 1 bedroom timber loft at 3201 N. Seminary in Lakeview just came on the market as a short sale.

It is listed at 33% off, or $100,000 below, its 2005 purchase price.

It has 800 square feet, 13 foot ceilings, central air, washer/dryer in the unit and an outdoor assigned parking space.

The unit is also just 3 blocks west of the Belmont El stop.

There’s no granite or stainless steel in the kitchen, however. And the listing says it’s leased until October 2009.

Is buying this loft at this price a better deal than renting?

Michael Sorenson at Re/Max City has the listing. See the pictures here.
Unit #208: 1 bedroom, 1 bath, 800 square feet

  • Sold in September 2005 for $300,000
  • Short Sale
  • Currently listed for $200,000 (parking included)
  • Assessments of $175 a month
  • Taxes of $2978
  • Central Air
  • Washer/Dryer in the unit

Contemporary Bronzeville Condo Finds a Buyer: 3120 S. Indiana

We chattered about this 2-bedroom “Mies Van der Rohe-inspired” unit near IIT at 3120 S. Indiana in Bronzeville last January.

3120-s-indiana-approved.jpg

It finally closed in June 2009 for $11,100 under the 2005 purchase price.

See our prior chatter and pictures of the interior here.

Unit #401: 2 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1300 square feet

  • Sold in December 2005 for $239,000
  • Was listed in January 2009 for $299,000 plus $10,000 for parking
  • Reduced to $285,900
  • Reduced again to $250,000
  • Sold in June 2009 for $227,900 (looks like that included the parking)
  • Koenig & Strey had the listing for the sale.
  • Assessments are $451 a month (includes an indoor pool)
  • Taxes are $3603
  • Central Air

Market Conditions: Tight Credit Restrictions Are Hurting Condo Sales

We’ve chattered about the problems with the Freddie and Fannie requirements in new condo buildings in the past. Both lenders will no longer guarantee mortgages in buildings that are less than  70% sold.

According to the Chicago Tribune, the restrictions are making it extremely difficult for developers to sell new units.

In March, sales of Chicago condo units listed with Midwest Real Estate Data LLC’s multiple listing service were down 41 percent from a year ago. In April, the year-over-year decline was 55 percent, and in May it was 56 percent. Yet according to the Chicago Association of Realtors, condos have experienced less price erosion than single-family homes.

“This is telling us that this is the healthiest segment of our real estate market,” said David Hanna, Realtors association president. “Why are we punishing people to be there? This is quashing entry-level buyers, which we need to get the market going.”

This year, almost 4,700 new condo and townhouse units are expected to be completed and ready for occupancy, and less than 60 percent of them were under contract in the year’s first quarter, according to data from Appraisal Research Counselors.

“I walk out of my office in Printer’s Row and all around me I see condos dead in the water,” Hanna said.

Developers are turning to FHA designation in order to get around some of the Freddie and Fannie restrictions.

As a result, some developers are turning to their own lenders and arranging short-term private financing for buyers. An increasing number, though, are applying to have their developments approved by the Federal Housing Administration.

A building has to be only 51 percent sold in order for buyers to receive FHA-backed mortgages, and the down payment required is 3 1/2 percent.

Because of the lesser underwriting requirements, the FHA’s share of mortgages insured for new-home purchases has grown, even before the more stringent Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac rules were adopted. For the five-month period between October and February, FHA’s market share of new-home purchases was almost 23 percent.

Condo buildings want in on that action. Since October, 68 Chicago condo buildings have received FHA approval, and an additional 51 buildings have applications pending.

Squeeze in lending rules choking condo market [Chicago Tribune, Mary Ellen Podmolik, July 12, 2009]

Market Conditions: NYT Says Out of Towners Flock to Chicago for Second Homes

According to the New York Times, out of town buyers are flocking to Chicago to buy up second homes because Chicago is seen as affordable and stable.

CELEBRATING their wedding anniversary in April at the Palmer House Hilton in downtown Chicago, where they were engaged 10 years ago, Chris and Kristine Warnes knew they would be taking home beautiful memories of a luxurious weekend. They had no idea that they would be taking home a new condominium, too — a pied-à-terre with views of the deep blue of Lake Michigan and the bustling street life of the Magnificent Mile along Michigan Avenue.

About a week after they returned home to the suburb of Naperville, Ill., their offer of $290,000 for a 900-square-foot loft in a former Montgomery Ward building, now called Six North Michigan, was accepted. The unit, listed at $325,000, has Italian kitchen cabinetry with granite and tile accents throughout, and access to building amenities like a theater, a gym and a heated indoor garage.

“Well, of course, if we’re offered something that’s listed $30,000 under the customized price everybody else would have to pay, we’re going to jump on that,” Mr. Warnes said. “For several years, we had talked about a place in the city. It will allow us to live out our dreams earlier that we thought.”

For the Warneses, it all started with a short walk from the hotel east to Millennium Park, that jewel of green space that earlier this decade transformed a rather barren stretch of downtown into an art, dining and entertainment destination. Looking back at the skyline, the Warneses noticed a beautiful old building advertising converted condos.

As luck would have it, several models were open. They liked what they saw. As even greater luck would have it, on the way out they bumped into an agent, Kathleen Malone of @Properties, and she told them she had one unit that was a steal of a deal.

“We walked away after that just to make sure we had our figures in order and to make sure this wasn’t something we were doing on a whim,” said Mr. Warnes, 36, a project manager for a global staffing company. “But this was an offer we couldn’t refuse.”

For some other buyers, the relatively cheap prices, the international airport and the lure of the possibility of the 2016 Olympic Games were the reasons behind the recent purchase.

This Swiss-based family chose Chicago over other international cities.

“We could have picked London, could have picked Italy or another place in Switzerland, but we like the Gold Coast,” said Abdellatif Laasraoui, 47, referring to the area north of the Magnificent Mile where his family moved into a half-million-dollar vacation condo last year. “There is no comparison in space or comfort. You’d have to pay 10 times more to get something comparable.”

“And,” added Mr. Laasraoui, an executive for a steel manufacturing company, “to commute from Chicago, it is very easy. I can go anywhere in the world from Chicago.”

Chicago is often seen as “cheap” compared to other big metropolitan cities with similar housing stock (i.e. New York and San Francisco.)

“I gave a tour of industrial Chicago to urban planning professionals from the Netherlands,” said Rachel Weber, a professor of urban planning and policy at the University of Illinois at Chicago, “and the substance of their questions had less to do with my talk than with residential real estate. They were all looking to scoop up affordable second homes.”

Elizabeth Ballis, a broker with Coldwell Banker Residential Properties, helped the Laasraouis find their Gold Coast condo. She could tell them firsthand about how downtown had evolved.

“I got married 40 years ago and we lived in the Loop, at 11th and Michigan,” she said. “There was nothing going on. People thought we were crazy.”

Now, Ms. Ballis is working with clients from places as varied as Tucson; Austin, Tex.; and Switzerland, who all want to be part of the downtown action. “It shows how things have changed,” she said.

Chicago is Becoming the Second-Home City [New York Times, Susan Saulny, July 9, 2009]

Authentic Timber Loft in Bucktown Closed: 1701 N. Damen

We chattered about this 1-bedroom brick and timber loft at 1701 N. Damen in Bucktown last January.

1701-n-damen-approved.jpg

See our prior chatter and pictures here.

It had a spiral staircase to a private rooftop deck.

The kitchen and bathroom were not updated, however. But the unit had other amenities like central air, parking and an in-unit washer/dryer.

It sold in March 2009.

1701-n-damen-_301-kitchen.jpg

Unit #301: 1 bedroom, 1 bath, no square footage listed

  • Sold in May 1993 for $134,500
  • Sold in April 1997 for $177,000
  • Sold in October 1999 for $210,000
  • Originally listed in September 2008 for $325,000
  • Reduced a few times
  • Was listed in January 2009 for $299,000 (included the parking)
  • Sold in March 2009 for $280,000 (included the parking)
  • Assessments of $285 a month
  • Taxes of $2862
  • W/D in the unit
  • Central Air
  • Fireplace
  • Private rooftop deck
  • David Bailey at Baird and Warner had the listing.

Live in the Heart of the Gold Coast for Less: 1221 N. Dearborn

This 2-bedroom duplex at 1221 N. Dearborn in the Gold Coast offers a lot of bang for the buck.

1221-n-dearborn-approved.jpg

It has recently been upgraded and has hardwood floors throughout, marble baths and the all-important in-unit washer/dryer (some units in the building don’t have that option.)

Parking is available and there’s a roof-top indoor pool. However, it doesn’t have central air (only window units.)

The listing says the seller is “motivated”.

It’s been reduced $80,000 since it was listed in May.

It’s also now listed $5,000 below the 2003 purchase price.

Is this a deal in the Gold Coast for the square footage?

1221-n-dearborn-_809n-livingroom-approved.jpg

1221-n-dearborn-_809n-kitchen-approved.jpg

1221-n-dearborn-_809n-bedroom-approved.jpg

1221-n-dearborn-_809n-bathroom-approved.jpg

Ricardo Jimenez at Rubloff has the listing. See more pictures and a virtual tour here.

See the property website here.

Unit #809N: 2 bedrooms, den, 2.5 baths, duplex, 2000 square feet

  • Sold in January 1992 for $145,000
  • Sold in March 2001 for $370,000
  • Sold in December 2003 for $426,000
  • Originally listed in May 2009 for $499,000 plus $35,000 for parking
  • Reduced twice
  • Currently listed for $419,000 plus $35,000 for parking
  • Assessments of $931 a month (includes cable/tv, doorman, pool)
  • Taxes of $6188
  • No central air
  • In-unit washer/dryer
  • Bedroom #1: 17×13
  • Bedroom #2: 27×14

The Million Dollar Loop Penthouse: 125 S. Jefferson

We’ve been chattering about what you get for a million dollars.

This 3-bedroom penthouse unit just came on the market in the Park Alexandria, a 2004-construction high rise in the central loop at 125 S. Jefferson.

The listing says it’s highly upgraded with 8 foot mahogany doors and stone bathrooms. It has 2 large terraces.

What’s the market at this price point in the loop?

Randy McGhee at Koenig & Strey has the listing. See the pictures here.

Unit #3302: 3 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, 2 car parking, no square footage listed

  • Sold in March 2005 for $769,500
  • Currently listed for $1.195 million (2 parking spaces included)
  • Assessments of $1430 a month (includes AC, TV/Cable, Gas)
  • Taxes of $11906
  • Bedroom #1: 14×12
  • Bedroom #2: 13×12
  • Bedroom #3: 14×12
  • Living room: 23×18
  • Family room: 19×14
  • Kitchen: 23×9

The Bucktown Vintage Cottage: 2347 W. Moffatt

We’ve chattered about a few Bucktown cottages recently. This 3-bedroom at 2347 W. Moffatt was built in 1893.

It has just been reduced $20,000.

It has 3 bedrooms, a new paver patio, a recently finished lower level and skylights.

The house also has central air and a 2 car garage.

Will it sell for over the 2005 purchase price?

Greg Whelan at Redfin has the listing. See the pictures here.

2347 W. Moffatt: 3 bedrooms, 3 baths, 2 car garage, no square footage listed

  • Sold in November 1999 for $213,000
  • Sold in July 2005 for $555,000
  • Originally listed in May 2009 for $629,500
  • Reduced
  • Currently listed for $609,500
  • Taxes of $5457
  • Central Air
  • Bedroom #1: 13×13
  • Bedroom #2: 13×13
  • Bedroom #3: 9×11