Why is The Palmolive “Luxury”? 159 E. Walton in the Gold Coast

There was recently a discussion about what makes The Palmolive, at 159 E. Walton, in the Gold Coast a “luxury” building as opposed to just another expensive high rise.

We’ve chattered about Unit #5B, a 2-bedroom unit that has seen over $1 million in custom upgrades, including a Clive Christian kitchen and a wood-paneled library.

These aren’t your “normal” condo finishes.

See our September 2008 chatter and pictures here.

The unit is still on the market after nearly a year and has now been reduced by $620,000.

Unit #5B: 2 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, 1 car parking, 2800 square feet

  • Sold in April 2007 from the developer for $1,669,500
  • Was listed in April 2008 for $2.495 million (included the parking)
  • Reduced
  • Was listed in September 2008 for $2.195 million (included the parking)
  • Reduced
  • Currently listed for $1.875 million
  • Assessments of $1697 a month 
  • Taxes are “new”
  • Janet Owen at Sudler Sotheby’s still has the listing. See more pictures here.

Market Conditions: Rents Falling Sharply in Downtown Chicago

As we’ve been chattering about lately, there is simply too much supply of units (both rental and condo) in the downtown area.

Not surprisingly, rents have fallen the most in 7 years.

From Crain’s:

Effective rents at Class A downtown buildings fell to $2.11 a square foot in the fourth quarter, down 6.2% from $2.25 in the year-earlier period, according to Appraisal Research Counselors, a Chicago-based real estate consulting firm. It was the first annual drop since 2003 and the biggest decline since 2001, when effective rents slid 7.7%.

“I think this next year is going to be really tough,” says Appraisal Research Vice-president Ron DeVries. “We’ve just been having lots of ugly conversations lately.”

Effective rents fell 6.6% between the third and fourth quarters, the biggest quarterly drop since Appraisal Research began surveying the downtown market in 1997. The fourth quarter is typically slow for most landlords, with rent declines even in strong markets.

According to Appraisal Research, occupancy is down to 90.6%, its lowest in 6 years. Still, Appraisal doesn’t see rents going as low as they did in 2001, the last bottom in the rental market, despite the huge influx of apartments and condo units coming on the market in 2009.

Still, an oversupply of apartments is the larger problem for landlords right now, especially in the South Loop. Developers completed three buildings comprising 1,016 apartments in the South Loop last year, according to Appraisal Research.

And condo rentals are becoming a bigger competitive threat, with developers adding nearly 3,200 condos to the South Loop in 2008 and 2009. Unwilling or unable to sell their units in a lousy market, many condo owners are renting them out for the time being.

Some are offering good deals on rent, one reason new apartment high-rises in the South Loop have been slow to fill up. A 278-unit building at 1401 S. State St. developed by Chicago-based Equity Residential and Dallas-based Lincoln Property Co. is only 60% leased 10 months after opening, according to Appraisal Research. Under normal market conditions, a similar building would be at least 90% full at this point.

The new South Loop projects “have hit the market at the worst time,” Mr. DeVries says. “If you want to live in the South Loop, you have lots of options. That has really slowed down the leasing.”

Downtown apartment rent falls by most in 7 years [Crain’s Chicago Business, Alby Gallun, Feb 23, 2009

Under Contract in 1 Day in 2005- What About 2009? 540 N. Lake Shore Drive

A studio just came on the market in the brick and timber loft building at 540 N. Lake Shore Drive in Streeterville.

The listing states that it sold in 1 day back in 2005. It also states that it is “super rare” and “priced to sell.”

The unit is on the top floor, has 12 foot timber ceilings and, the listing says, a “new” kitchen. There is no in-unit washer/dryer but one is allowed.

It has a 5 x 9 lofted sleeping area you access through a ladder.

Will this unit repeat the success of the 2005 sale? It has already been listed for 3 days and from what I can tell, is still available.

Curt Ratcliff at @Properties has the listing. See all the pictures here.

Unit #714: studio, no square footage listed

  • Sold in December 1993 for $74,000
  • Sold in January 2003 for $139,000
  • Sold in November 2005 for $200,000
  • Currently listed for $203,900
  • Assessments of $240 a month
  • Taxes of $1810
  • Central Air
  • Lofted sleeping area that is 5×9
  • Parking available as rental in the building
  • No washer/dryer in the unit
  • Living space: 20×18
  • Kitchen: 8×8

We Love Authentic Lofts: 1528 S. Wabash in the South Loop

We’ve chattered about authentic lofts in Printers Row and Motor Row, but there are a smattering of other authentic loft buildings in the South Loop including the Imperial Lofts at 1528 S. Wabash.

1528-s-wabash-approved.jpg

This 2-bedroom unit has 11-foot high concrete ceilings, brick and windows in both bedrooms.

It has also been reduced by $15,000.

1528-s-wabash-_608-livingroom-approved.jpg

1528-s-wabash-_608-kitchen-approved.jpg

1528-s-wabash-_608-bedroom-approved.jpg

Elizabeth Sheeran of Ideal Location Chicago Real Estate has the listing. See more pictures here.

Unit#608: 2 bedrooms, 2 baths, no square footage listed

  • Sold in January 2004 for $268,000
  • Originally listed in October 2008 for $299,900 (parking is extra)
  • Reduced
  • Currently listed for $284,900 (parking is $34,000 extra)
  • Assessments of $412 a month (includes heat, gas and cable)
  • Taxes of $3327
  • Washer/Dryer in the unit
  • Central Air
  • Bedroom #1: 14×12
  • Bedroom #2: 12×11
  • Living room: 14×18
  • Kitchen: 14×9

Market Conditions: Foreclosures Affecting All Parts of Chicago

The Chicago Tribune explored the growing foreclosure crisis in Chicago with a Sunday Tribune cover story showcasing the problem in both the south and north sides of the city.

As foreclosures soar to historic levels, the infection has spread beyond places of perennial concern, such as West Garfield Park and Englewood.

Condo ghost towns replete with granite and stainless steel have emerged on stretches of the North Side, leaving a pox of hollow buildings dotting the landscape.

“We’re kind of in an unprecedented moment,” said Philip Ashton, an assistant professor of urban planning at the University of Illinois at Chicago. “A lot of the research that is on the table relates to a completely different world.”

“Condos do present a different challenge, but it still is not at all at the same scale,” said Ellen Sahli, first deputy in Chicago’s Department of Community Development.

Not at the scale of neighborhoods such as Humboldt Park, where more than half of the loans issued in 2006 and 2007 qualified as subprime and unemployment hovered around 11 percent in 2007, according to city data. There, gangs often take over abandoned homes, peeling back the bowed plywood from the windows to store drugs and set up shop, residents say.

“When we first moved over here it was a nice, mixed neighborhood,” said Barbara Carter, who has lived on her block more than 20 years and has seen some of the neighborhood’s elderly lose their homes. “Now, it’s been so many shots [fired] at my house I ain’t got fingers to count.”

As we’ve chattered about here before, foreclosures are especially spiking in Rogers Park where there were simply too many condo conversions. With the current market downturn, the smaller developers can’t hold on and many are facing foreclosure.

What about those homebuyers who have already bought a unit in those buildings in trouble?

The half-empty Rogers Park condo building at 1633 W. Farwell Ave. shows the breadth of the foreclosure crisis in many different ways.

Miller’s building has 39 units—20 are vacant, foreclosed on after the builder couldn’t sell them. Rogers Park saw 288 foreclosures in 2008, a 157 percent increase from 2007. Eighty percent of those were condominiums.

Some builders estimate there is two years worth of housing stock for sale in Rogers Park thanks to overdevelopment and rapid, unregulated conversions.

Other areas seeing spikes include Lincoln Square, where foreclosures rose nearly 134 percent from last year; two-thirds were condo units.

Foreclosures spur neighborhood ghost towns [Chicago Tribune, Azam Ahmed and Darnell Little, Feb 22, 2009] 

Deserted condo units test those who remain [Chicago Tribune, Feb 22, 2009]

In Washington Park, condo boom went bust [Chicago Tribune, Feb 22, 2009]

Vacant homes offer ominous view of Chicago Lawn [Chicago Tribune, Feb 22, 2009]

Market Conditions: If Manhattan Luxury Prices are Falling- What About Chicago?

This week Barron’s discusses the state of the luxury housing market in Manhattan given the carnage in the financial sector which makes up nearly a quarter of all jobs in the New York metropolitan area.

Chicago isn’t nearly as dependent on the financial sector but Chicago still sports quite a few hedge funds, mutual funds, investment banking jobs, as well as consulting and legal jobs.

In the Barron’s article, “luxury” is designated as being priced over $5 million. Here in Chicago, I would put the number more at $1 million or maybe $1.5 million and higher.

How far might prices fall in Manhattan?

And what are the implications for the Chicago housing market in that same price range?

“It’s a ‘cart before the horse’ discussion,” says Jonathan Miller of Miller Samuel.

“Credit has to stabilize and liquidity returned to the market before we can talk about stabilized housing markets and ‘bottoms.’ …It will be a multi-year period for things to sort themselves out.”

Michael Shvo, one of Manhattan’s mega-brokers, thinks that prices across the city will have to come down further, and credit will have to become more available, before demand picks up. How far will prices fall?

“Certain projects will be down 50% from the peak; Certain others will be down 30%.”

Manhattan on sale [Barron’s Magazine, Leslie Norton, Feb 23, 2009]- free preview or subscription only.

Is the Vetro Auction Really a “Deal”? Look at 1255 S. State

The auction of 40 units at The Vetro, at 611 S. Wells, in the South Loop in early March is “big” news in the real estate world.

The auction is being advertised all over the Chicago Tribune as well as such upscale newspapers like the Wall Street Journal.

Even The Vetro itself is getting into the act. The developer has made the website more restrictive since I last chattered about the auction.

Suddenly, you have to actually register on the website to obtain more information about the auction (whereas before, it freely listed prices and floorplans for anyone to peruse.)

Here’s what the website states:

“Filling out this form allows you to access more information about Vetro and the exciting opportunity to purchase a new condominium at auction prices. Completion of this form does not obligate you to participate in the auction – separate registration is required.”

With buzz building around the auction, it led me to wonder: is it really going to be a “deal”?

Take, for instance, the smaller 1-bedroom units. The website says they’re 684 square feet and starting at $150,000 (includes the parking.) That’s the “minimum” bid.

But there are other similar new construction buildings in the South Loop offering similar sized units for around the same price.

Take 1255 S. State, otherwise known as Vision on State. It is 2007-2008 construction, much like The Vetro.

Some owners have been under stress in the building. Unit #1411, a 677 square foot 1-bedroom recently came on the market as a short sale.

Unit #1411: 1 bedroom, 1 bath, 677 square feet

  • Sold in April 2008 for $419,500
  • “Short Sale”
  • Originally listed on Nov 3, 2008 for $248,900
  • Reduced to $229,900
  • Reduced again on Nov 26, 2008 to $199,900 (included the parking)
  • Currently under contract
  • Assessments of $350 a month
  • Taxes are “new”
  • Century 21 Universal has the listing. See the pictures here.

Will the buyer of Unit #1411 actually end up with a better “deal” than those attending The Vetro auction for similarly sized units?

Stay tuned.

We Love Authentic Lofts: 720 S. Dearborn in Printers Row

We’ve chattered about many of the authentic loft buildings in Printers Row, including this 57-unit building at 720 S. Dearborn.

720-s-dearborn-approved.jpg

This 1-bedroom concrete loft with 11-foot ceilings recently came on the market. It doesn’t have parking or a w/d in the unit, but it is 825 square feet and right in the heart of historic Printers Row.

720-s-dearborn-_502-livingroom-approved.jpg

720-s-dearborn-_502-diningroom-approved.jpg

720-s-dearborn-_502-kitchen-approved.jpg

Tom Feddor at Keller Williams Realty- West Loop has the listing. See more pictures and property details here.

Unit #502: 1 bedroom, 1 bath, 825 square feet

  • Sold in March 1996 for $91,000
  • Sold in June 2000 for $161,000
  • Sold in April 2004 for $173,000
  • Currently listed for $219,900
  • Assessments of $456 a month (includes heat, air, cable tv)
  • Taxes of $1952
  • No in-unit w/d
  • No parking
  • Central air

One Year Later and Trying to Sell (again): 143 W. Burton in Old Town

We’ve chattered about this art deco building at 143 W. Burton in Old Town (or is that River North???) several times in the past year.

See our March 2008 chatter and pictures here.

See also our July 2008 chatter and pictures talking about the same units here.

Unit #3S, an 800-square foot 1/1 finally sold in September 2008.

Here’s its history:

Unit #3S: 1 bedroom, 1 bath, 800 square feet, penthouse unit with skylight

  • Sold in June 2004 for $233,000
  • Was listed in March 2008 at $249,900 plus 29k for parking
  • Reduced 
  • Was listed in July 2008 for $230,000 plus $29k for parking
  • Closed in September 2008 for $226,500 (I don’t know if that included the parking)
  • Assessments of $210 a month
  • Taxes of $3,406
  • No central air

Unit #2S never sold. It vanished from the market but has now come back on at nearly the same price as it was listed for last summer. And now there’s no parking – but rental parking is available.

Will it have better luck in 2009?

Berg Properties still has the listing. See the most recent pictures here.

Here’s its history again:

Unit #2S: 1 bedroom, 1 bath, 800 square feet

  • Sold in November 2001 for $194,500
  • Sold in August 2002 for $214,000
  • Was listed in March 2008 at $260,000 (included the parking)
  • Increased!
  • Was listed in July 2008 for $265,000 (parking is $20k extra)
  • Withdrawn
  • Currently listed for $269,900 (rental parking available)
  • Assessment of $210 a month (special is paid)
  • Taxes of $3,039
  • No Central Air

Does Parking Matter? 1647 N. Sedgwick in Old Town Revisited

We last chattered about this 2-bedroom vintage unit at 1647 N. Sedgwick in Old Town in November 2008.

Its “sister” unit on the top floor sold in only a few weeks in July 2008 for nearly the asking price (asking of $419,000- and sold for $412,000).  That unit had both a private rooftop deck AND a garage parking spot.

See our former chatter and pictures of both units here.

Five months later and Unit #2 hasn’t been quite as lucky. It has also been reduced by $6,000.

Does lack of parking matter?

Sonia Madden at Koenig & Strey still has the listing. See more pictures here.

Unit #2: 2 bedrooms, 1 bath, no square footage listed

  • Sold in April 1994 for $182,500
  • Sold in February 1997 for $189,000
  • Sold in April 2001 for $277,500
  • Originally listed in October 2008 for $395,000
  • Reduced
  • Currently listed for $389,000
  • Assessments of $145 a month
  • Taxes of $3840
  • Central air
  • Fireplace
  • Washer/Dryer in-unit
  • Leased parking
  • Bedroom #1: 15×8
  • Bedroom #2: 15×8
  • Office: 10×9