The Full Floor Vintage 3-Bedroom: 2043 N. Mohawk in Lincoln Park
A lot of the 3-bedroom units we see in Lincoln Park and Lakeview are new construction or duplex downs so it’s somewhat unusual to see a 3-bedroom vintage unit all on one level like this one at 2043 N. Mohawk.
It not only has 3 bedrooms but also a family room and a dining room.
The unit has high ceilings and built-ins along with original exposed wood moldings. The listing says the kitchen has been renovated and it has stainless steel appliances.
It also has a back deck.
There is a washer/dryer in the unit and 1 parking space is included. The only thing it seems to be missing is central air- as it has window units.
The unit has been reduced by $19,100 since September.
It’s also priced $33,000 under the 2007 purchase price.
Harry Pfaff at Prudential Rubloff has the listing. See the pictures and a virtual tour here.
See the property website here.
Unit #2N: 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1 parking space, no square footage listed
- Sold in June 2000 for $399,000
- Sold in February 2007 for $612,000
- Originally listed in September 2009 for $599,000
- Reduced
- Currently listed at $579,900
- Assessments of $415 a month (includes heat)
- Taxes of $6508
- No central air – window units
- Washer/Dryer in the unit
- Bedroom #1: 10×14
- Bedroom #2: 10×12
- Bedroom #3: 9×13
- Family room: 13×15
- Dining room: 10×13
- Living room: 13×19
- Kitchen: 13×14
good street!
narrow living room!
I love vintage, but this place does nothing for me. I say this goes for about 510k.
Great area, and alot of space for the hood. The limited functionality of the living room and dining room takes something away from the square footage, but still a good amount of space. I think it’ll find a buyer closer to $500-525k.
What do we think has been done to the apartment since 2000?
Looks to me like the kitchen is newer than that; claims reno’d baths, but no pix (hiding in plain sight?). I’d say $400k + actual reno cost = fair value, and that *might* hit Matt’s $510k. Even then, don’t feel to good about ~$3k/month for a creme-filling unit with smallish bedrooms.
Limited functionality of “living room and dining room” I guess I meant the “living room and family room”. The walk-through room with the little table seems pretty much wasted, and the tv area is too narrow.
Groove Likey!!!!!!!!!!!
Tons of vintage places have that pass through room. What did previous generations use it for? My google skills have failed me, and I’ve been wondering for some time. Dining room maybe?
I have a friend who looked at this place. She said it was narrow but nicely furnished. This will sell though for at least $525,000.
The layout seems very limiting. And I wonder about the wiring in the joint, given the unsightly track lighting in the main rooms. That said, my guess is that someone falls in love with the fit and finish, and overpays for the place.
No garage (just “parking”), no CAC or spacepak, wee rooms, and not the top floor. And the comps shown are a joke (and not only because these are places that are still for sale). 626 W. Belden #2 a couple blocks away is probably a little smaller (w/o awkward passthru space and w/ garage and w/ CAC), but sold for $460K.
Still, not a bad place, and clearly a great loc. They won’t get $579.9K, but may something in the low $500Ks.
BAD DECK IS BAD
TV above fireplace – LAME.
Victorians often had double parlors with sliding (or hidden) doors in between. One parlor was for family and the other for guests. Hard to tell if this is the case with this unit.
HD – “TV above fireplace – LAME.”
Agreed, when will str8 people STOP doing this!?
“BAD DECK IS BAD”
??
back deck is bad?
bad as in awful, or bad as in good?
???