Get a 3-Bedroom Victorian House for Just $175,000 in Edgewater: 6105 N. Paulina

This 3-bedroom Victorian single family home at 6105 N. Paulina in Edgewater came on the market in September 2010.

6105-n-paulina-approved.jpg

Built in 1898 on a 25×125 lot, the listing says it “needs updating but it is livable.”

Two of the 3 bedrooms are on the second floor with the third on the main level.

There is no central air – it has window units only.

It also doesn’t have a garage but it does have a parking pad.

The bathrooms still have their claw foot tubs and some of the vintage features remain in the living and dining rooms.

First listed in September 2010 for $369,000, it is now a short sale and has been reduced $194,000.

Is this a deal for someone who has vision?

6105-n-paulina-living-room-approved.jpg

6105-n-paulina-kitchen-approved.jpg

6105-n-paulina-bedroom-approved.jpg

6105-n-paulina-bathroom-approved.jpg

6105-n-paulina-parking-pad-approved.jpg

Santiago Valdez at Re/Max Signature has the listing. See more pictures here.

6105 N. Paulina: 3 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms, 1670 square feet

  • Sold in July 1988 for $83,000
  • Sold in August 1993 for $134,000
  • Sold in April 1997 for $142,500
  • Sold in June 2000 for $210,000
  • Originally listed in September 2010 for $369,000
  • Reduced numerous times
  • Currently listed as a “short sale” for $175,000
  • Taxes of $4203
  • No central air
  • 2 car parking pad
  • Bedroom #1: 20×10 (second floor)
  • Bedroom #2: 12×14 (second floor)
  • Bedroom #3: 12×7 (main floor)
  • Sun room: 7×12

21 Responses to “Get a 3-Bedroom Victorian House for Just $175,000 in Edgewater: 6105 N. Paulina”

  1. I would be worried about the amount of work needed in this home but it seems like a reasonable deal. I think if it were east of Clark it would be worth a lot more though.

    0
    0
  2. That kitchen ceiling and floor tile – ugh! (clue in gagging sounds). And do the bathrooms have showers, or just those 100-year old tubs? That could be a bit inconvenient.

    0
    0
  3. http://www.redfin.com/IL/Chicago/3904-N-Bernard-St-60618/home/13455850

    Here’s a victorian just listed today. Look at the virtual tour

    only! $1,318,000

    How F’in stupid can realtors be?

    0
    0
  4. “How F’in stupid can realtors be?”

    Stupid enough not to even proof the list price before hitting submit, obviously. Totally just a typo.

    0
    0
  5. I know, I know anon(tfo). That’s a pretty stupid typo though.

    0
    0
  6. “I know, I know anon(tfo). That’s a pretty stupid typo though.”

    Especially bc it’s hard to guess where the typo is. Is it supposed to be 318 or 131/138?

    0
    0
  7. This place needs $200K worth of work, but it is worth the price asked.

    Very nice neighborhood. You’re almost in Andersonville here and it’s an easy walk from this place.

    0
    0
  8. you basically just buying dirt. Rip it down and start over.

    0
    0
  9. Looks like all the original interior wood trim has been painted over. So much for the good part of “vintage character”.

    0
    0
  10. “Here’s a victorian just listed today. Look at the virtual tour
    only! $1,318,000”

    Huh? what are you talking about. It seems like a great house for the money. It says “131,800”

    0
    0
  11. Before people were so artificial and thus forced to worry about “authenticity” (they having had a full dose of it in day to day life) they could paint over wood trim and not worry about it.

    0
    0
  12. Painting over trim is trashy and it’s right up there with cars on cinderblocks on the front lawn.

    “Oldman on September 24th, 2011 at 2:53 pm

    Before people were so artificial and thus forced to worry about “authenticity” (they having had a full dose of it in day to day life) they could paint over wood trim and not worry about it.”

    0
    0
  13. “Painting over trim is trashy and it’s right up there with cars on cinderblocks on the front lawn.”

    I love painted trim! ha! ha! My current home has some painted trim and some unpainted trim. I like the painted so much better (as an aesthetic.)

    Though I have to say, I DO like the unpainted ceiling beams (if a house has them.)

    0
    0
  14. Sabrina,

    During the 50’s and 60’s, a large number of victorian homes were ruined. The trim was painted over, drop ceilings were installed, hardwood floors were covered with green carpet, the original siding was covered with asphalt roll siding. It’s taken 100 years for many of these homes to be restored to their former glory.

    0
    0
  15. Talk about stripping the character out of a vintage home:

    Check out this 4/3 duplex down in an 1890’s west town greystone.

    http://www.coldwellbankeronline.com/ID/2275086

    0
    0
  16. I curse the trim painters daily as I heat gun paint-laden cherry wood. I figure chelation costs less than having the pros do it.

    0
    0
  17. I am a fan of modern but its disgusting what they did to that greystone. I’ll never understand the mismatch between exterior and interior I see so often. Talk about confused owners.

    0
    0
  18. Many of those hideous, gaudy Victorians were ruined by being built in the first place.

    0
    0
  19. Hahahaha oldman I like you already. I bet you lovee bourbon and I do too.

    0
    0
  20. hd- you are sounding like Rogers Park Laura!

    0
    0
  21. Under K – investors LOVE LOVE LOVE a cheap property

    0
    0

Leave a Reply