Market Conditions: Chicago Area Homeowners Now Choosing Strategic Default

The Chicago Tribune explored the phenomenom of “strategic default” over the weekend.  We already chattered about it a bit over the weekend in one of the other posts but I thought others might want to get into the conversation.

A “strategic default” is where the homeowner still has the means to pay the mortgage but decides to stop paying, and let the property go into foreclosure, even though it will ruin the homeowners credit.

Others have called it “walking away.”

Usually this is done for financial reasons.

Here are a few of the stories:

Likier put almost 20 percent down to purchase a $312,000 townhouse in Westmont in 2006 and lived there until two years ago, when he remarried and bought a home in Chicago Ridge. For a year he rented the townhouse. When a change in rules at the community meant Likier’s days as a landlord would end, he called his lender and asked if he could rework the loan, but he didn’t have enough equity left to refinance the $240,000 mortgage.

Likier, 55, took a long look at his finances and the combined monthly mortgage payments of more than $4,700 and decided last fall that the struggle wasn’t worth it.

He listed the townhouse for $249,000, figuring he would bring $20,000 to the closing table to facilitate a deal. The listing has since dropped to $179,000, which is lower than the unit sold for when it was built in 1999. He stopped paying the mortgage in January and recently was served with foreclosure papers.

Despite the fact that he and his wife are employed and have an annual household income near $150,000, he’s comfortable with his decision.

“I did a lot of soul-searching about whether it was morally the right thing to do,” he said. “I felt there was no moral obligation to make a payment. The contract says it’s a financial obligation, not a moral obligation.

“I was in a boat with a slow leak. It was manageable, but I know I was slowly sinking.”

Lots of Chicago area homeowners are already underwater. According to the article, CoreLogic estimates 25% of Chicago area homeowners are underwater and another 5% have less than 5% equity which, as prices continue to slide in 2011, puts them in danger of being underwater as well.

The decision isn’t made overnight. “You see the house price dropping, you don’t walk away the next day,” said Luigi Zingales, a professor at University of Chicago Booth School of Business who studies strategic defaults. “You hope that the first time the condo next to you sold for half price, that it isn’t going to happen to (you.)”

“Especially in states like Illinois, people held out hope for a little while,” Zingales said. “Maybe they are paying the mortgage a little but when they’re seeing that prices aren’t recovering, they default.

A lot of people strategically default because they want to preserve their retirement savings.”

When a vacation condo in Panama City, Fla., became difficult to rent, Naperville resident Philip Burdi tried to sell it for $90,000 — far less than the $190,000 owed on the mortgage. His lender, doubting Burdi’s financial hardship, wouldn’t approve it.

Burdi stopped paying the two mortgages on the condo in March 2010 and is over the guilt, particularly after he tapped retirement savings to settle the second mortgage debt. He occasionally stays in the condo, and he lets friends and family stay there for free. He has yet to be served with foreclosure.

“I know it’s going to have very dire consequences when the foreclosure happens,” he said. “Millions of Americans are in the same shoes I’m in.”

Some homeowners are getting all their ducks in order before they default by buying new properties and cars. Then, when the foreclosure hits their credit score, it doesn’t  have as much of an impact.

Margie Jones prepared for the fallout, getting her finances in order and making any big-ticket purchases. When she and her husband bought a home in El Paso, Texas, they put it in his name only.

The Chicago native endured multiple deployments to Iraq and Kosovo as an Army warrant officer overseeing motor pools. But she no longer can take the financial stress associated with a three-flat in Chicago’s Logan Square neighborhood, a home she still lists as her legal address, and a mortgage she took over from her mother more than five years ago.

Bought in 2002, the building where her mother and two renters live last appraised for less than half its purchase price. Efforts to refinance its two mortgages failed, and the first lien holder wouldn’t approve a loan modification because the lender views Jones, who is now stationed in El Paso, as an investor.

The last time she made a payment on the first mortgage was in February.

“We were barely able to make ends meet,” Jones said. “I told my husband I can’t do this anymore. The day I made the decision to just walk away was one of the better night’s sleeps I had because I wasn’t going to worry about it anymore.”

Jones, who said her credit score was above 700, is still waiting for the decision to catch up with her, but she’s accepting of it. “I can stand to lose a couple hundred points.”

Sinking values prompting homeowners to consider strategic defaults as best business decision [Chicago Tribune, Mary Ellen Podmolik, May 22, 2011]

3-Bedroom East Lincoln Park Duplex Down Sells for $50K Under 2001 Price: 2031 N. Howe

We last chattered about this 3-bedroom duplex down at 2031 N. Howe in East Lincoln Park in early April 2011.

See our prior chatter here.

Back then, it was listed for $6,000 under the 2001 purchase price at $619,000.

It had been on the market over a year and had been reduced $220,000.

If you recall, 2 out of the 3 bedrooms were on the main level with the third bedroom and the family room in the lower level.

At 3000 square feet, the duplex down was just steps below grade.

The kitchen had white cabinets, granite counter tops and stainless steel appliances.

It was in the coveted Lincoln school district.

It had all the other amenities buyers look for: central air, in-unit washer/dryer and 1 car parking. 

Many of you thought it would ultimately sell at a much lower price.

  • notClio thought it would sell south of $525,000
  • Ed guessed $500k to $550k
  • Homedelete said $499k but not until late summer
  • anon guessed $520k and that the buyer would have to put $50k to $75k into it to update the property

It recently sold for $575,000– or $50,000 under the 2001 purchase price.

Maybe the East Lincoln Park market is hotter than many of you thought? (once you get down to a certain price point- as it obviously didn’t sell anywhere near its original list.)

Eudice Fogel at Prudential Rubloff had the listing. You can still see the pictures here.

Unit #1: 3 bedrooms, 3 baths, 3000 square feet, duplex down, 1-car garage parking

  • Sold in September 1995 for $376,500
  • Sold in September 2001 for $625,000
  • Originally listed in March 2010 for $839,000
  • Reduced numerous times
  • Was listed in April 2011 for $619,000
  • Sold in May 2011 for $575,000
  • Assessments of $220 a month
  • Taxes of $5080
  • Central Air
  • Washer/dryer in the unit
  • Bedroom #1: 16×12 (main level)
  • Bedroom #2: 12×11 (main level)
  • Bedroom #3: 12×11 (lower level)
  • Family room: 35×12 (lower level) 

2 1/2 Year Later, This 3-Bedroom House Returns to the Market: 3729 N. Hermitage in Lakeview

We last chattered about this 3-bedroom single family home at 3729 N. Hermitage in Lakeview in December of 2008.

3729-n-hermitage-approved.jpg

See our prior chatter and the old pictures here.

Back then, we chattered about whether the house, listed at $699,000, was “affordable” given the prices of other single family homes in the neighborhood.

Many of you thought it was still too expensive though some of you thought it would sell somewhere in the $500,000s.

Remember, this was December 2008, which was in the midst of the financial crisis.

The house never sold. It was rented for several years (previous rental asking price was $3,000 a month.)

It has come back on the market listed $80,000 under the 2008 list price.

It also has some new paint and staging.

At 3100 square feet, the house is on a smaller than standard 25×108 lot.

There is no garage, but one could be built.

The kitchen has granite counter tops and stainless steel appliances.

It has a partially finished basement, as you can see from the pictures.

2 out of 3 bedrooms are on the second floor with the third one on the main level. There is also an open loft space on the second level.

In December 2008, realtor Eric Rojas commented:

“They should have taken it off when the melt-down hit in October (if possible) and bring it back in February at $629K with some touch-ups and it should fly out the door.

This is a move-in quality home in a nice location. Regardless of comparables that help it’s list price (which show a teardown/gut rehab property selling for $450K on the street this summer) this house will sell for over $600K, especially with favorable financing rates hanging around. Great spot, nice condition, great deck. If it has any yard at all, then it should get over $600K.”

2 1/2 years later- what will this house sell for now?

3729-n-hermitage-living-room-approved.jpg

3729-n-hermitage-kitchen-approved.jpg

3729-n-hermitage-bedroom-approved.jpg

3729-n-hermitage-basement-approved.jpg

3729-n-hermitage-back-deck-approved.jpg

Mitch Gordon at Baird & Warner has the listing. See more pictures here.

Or you can see it in person at the Open House on May 29: 11- 1 PM.

3729 N. Hermitage: 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, 3100 square feet

  • Sold in November 1990 for $126,000
  • Sold in September 2000 for $380,000
  • Originally listed in June 2008 for $774,900
  • Reduced several times
  • Was listed in December 2008 at $699,000
  • Withdrawn and Rented
  • Currently listed at $619,000
  • Taxes of $8972
  • Central Air
  • No garage
  • Bedroom #1: 15×12 (second floor)
  • Bedroom #2: 14×13 (second floor)
  • Bedroom #3: 10×10 (main floor)
  • Loft: 13×12 (second floor)
  • Partially finished basement

Auctioned Off 2/2 in The Eddystone Sells for $127K Under the 2004 Price: 421 W. Melrose

We last chattered about this vintage 2-bedroom in the historic Eddystone at 421 W. Melrose in Lakeview in December 2010.

421-w-melrose-approved.jpg

See our prior chatter here.

It had been Fannie Mae owned since May 2010.

After a few months on the market as a traditional listing, the unit then went to auction.

From the original pictures- it appeared that the kitchen and bathrooms were intact.

The kitchen had white appliances.

There were hardwood floors throughout and crown molding.

However, the unit did not have central air, in-unit washer/dryer or deeded parking.

It finally closed at $127,250 under the 2004 purchase price at $215,250.

Did someone get a deal?

Rakesh Parikh at Keller Williams Lincoln Park had the listing.

Unit #8C: 2 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1600 square feet

  • Sold in November 2004 for $342,500
  • Fannie Mae owned in May 2010
  • Was listed in October 2010 for $256,500
  • Reduced
  • Was listed in early December 2010 for $230,900
  • Currently listed with an “unknown” price as it’s going to auction in January 2011
  • Sold in May 2011 for $215,250
  • Assessments of $1043 a month (includes heat, gas, cable, doorman)
  • Taxes of $4496
  • No central air
  • No in-unit washer/dryer
  • No parking
  • Bedroom #1: 16×12
  • Bedroom #2: 16×13

550 N. St. Clair in Streeterville Extends Its Smart Car Promotion Through This Weekend

Some of you may have seen last weekend’s special promotion for the remaining developer units at 550 N. St. Clair in Streeterville.

550-n-st-clair-approved.jpg

This is a newer construction high rise. I was told the unsold units had been rented out previously.

There are 15 units available (not all of which are on the MLS). They are the following:

  1. 5 studios
  2. 4 one-bedrooms
  3. 3 two-bedrooms
  4. 3 three-bedrooms

The promotion is 10% off all the units.

AND- if you buy a 2 or 3 bedroom unit you get a free Smart Car.

The weather was so bad last weekend they decided to extend the offer through to a second weekend.  (Aka, few people turned out for the promotion).

The new price points are as follows:

  • Studios from $197,100 to $227,700
  • 1 bedroom/1 baths from $312,300 to $423,000
  • 2 bedroom/2 baths from $490,500 to $1,001,700
  • 3 bedroom/3 baths-4 baths from $1,123,200 to $1,379,700

It’s been awhile since we’ve seen any developers doing special promotions.

A few years ago, these kinds of deals used to cause excitement (remember the Vetro auction?)

But what about in 2011?

Will giving away a car get buyers in the door in this market?

Weichert Realtors is handling the sales. See more details on the promotion on the building’s website here.

This 3-Bedroom North Center SFH Is Now Priced Under $330,000: 2255 W. Montrose

We last chattered about this 3-bedroom single family home at 2255 W. Montrose on the border of North Center/Lincoln Square in March 2011.

2255-w-montrose-approved.jpg

See our prior chatter here.

Many of you thought the house should just be torn down.

Some of you said it made you sad.

Those who guessed about the selling price estimated between $250k and $275k.

Since our March chatter, the price has been reduced $70,000.

It is now listed $20,000 under the 2005 purchase price at $329,000.

If you recall, while it is a 3 bedroom, all 3 bedrooms are in the lower level.

Located across from Welles Park, the listing says it was recently “remodeled” and has new appliances, floors, walls, ceilings, bathrooms and has not been occupied since completion of the remodel.

The kitchen has stainless steel appliances, white counters and white cabinets.

Built on a 24×125 lot, the brick “step ranch” appears to have at least a 1-car garage. But the house does not have central air.

The listing says it is NOT a short sale or a foreclosure.

How low will this go before it finds a buyer?

Or WILL it even find one?

Valdir Barion at @Properties still has the listing. See the pictures here.

2255 W. Montrose: 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1350 square feet, 1 car garage

  • Sold in September 2005 for $349,000
  • Originally listed in February 2011 for $399,900
  • Was listed in March 2011 for $399,900
  • Reduced several times
  • Currently listed for $329,000
  • Taxes of $5006
  • No central air (window units only)
  • Bedroom #1: 9×12 (lower level)
  • Bedroom #2: 10×9 (lower level)
  • Bedroom #3: 10×9 (lower level)
  • Family room: 11×15 (lower level)
  • Laundry room: 6×12 (lower level)

Get The “Yellow House” in Old Town for Under the 2007 Price: 304 W. Willow

This 4-bedroom single family home at 304 W. Willow in Old Town can’t be missed when driving or walking down the street with its bright yellow facade.

304-w-willow.jpg

On the market since October 2010, it has been reduced $50,000.

It is now listed $110,000 under the 2007 purchase price.

Built in 1874 on a 30×78 lot, the house is located in the “real” Old Town triangle neighborhood.

It also has the rare feature in the triangle of off street parking. And not just for 1 car- but for 3 cars- in the side driveway.

3 out of the 4 bedrooms are on the second level with the 4th in the lower level – along with a den.

The kitchen has stainless steel appliances and granite counter tops as well as woodmode maple cabinets and a farm sink.

The master bathroom has marble and tile.

At 2700 square feet and WITH the 3-car parking, is this a deal for the heart of Old Town?

Phyllis Hall at Koenig & Strey Real Living has the listing. See the pictures here.

304 W. Willow: 4 bedrooms, 3.5 baths, 2700 square feet, 3 car parking on the side drive

  • Sold in December 1989 for $475,000 (but I think this is a typo when you see the mortgage amount. Was probably $275,000)
  • Sold in December 2000 for $425,000
  • Sold in May 2001 for $565,000
  • Sold in April 2007 for $1.44 million
  • Originally listed in October 2010 for $1.38 million
  • Reduced
  • Currently listed at $1.33 million
  • Taxes of $20129
  • Central Air
  • Bedroom #1: 17×14 (second level)
  • Bedroom #2: 17×9 (second level)
  • Bedroom #3: 10×10 (second level)
  • Bedroom #4: 15×11 (lower level)
  • Den: 17×20 (lower level)

Market Conditions: YOY April Sales Decline 26.2% in Chicago; Median Price Continues to Slide

The data for April home sales is out.  Remember, last year was still influenced by the tax credit. Buyers had to be under contract by the end of April (but didn’t have to close until June.)

The IAR is, for the second month in a row, choosing to separate out some of the Chicago condo data when it has not normally done that (in this case- the median price.)

From the Illinois Association of Realtors:

In the city of Chicago, April home sales (single family and condominiums) totaled 1,464, up 1.0 percent from 1,450 sales in the previous month and down 26.2 percent from 1,984 homes sold in April 2010.

The city of Chicago median price for single family and condominiums in April 2011 was $205,500 up 7.6 percent compared to $191,000 in March 2011 and down 8.7 percent from a year ago in April when it was $225,000. For condominiums specifically, the median price reached $290,000 in April 2011, up 4.3 percent year-over-year from $278,012 in April 2010. 

Here are the sales statistics for April since 2007:

  • 2011: 1464 sales
  • 2010: 1984 sales
  • 2009: 1407 sales
  • 2008: 1886 sales
  • 2007: 2419 sales

Here are the median prices:

  • 2011: $205,500
  • 2010: $225,000
  • 2009: $218,000
  • 2008: $300,000
  • 2007: $289,800

“An incentivized market helped move more units last spring, however a competitive distressed market this year has led to an increase in the condo median homes sales price to $290,000 in the city of Chicago. Housing values are still on the lower side of the market but the value of housing and homeownership is motivating buyers to purchase homes while they can still get lower interest rates and more home within their budget,” said Mabel Guzman, president of the Chicago Association of REALTORS® and a REALTOR® with Envision Real Estate LLC, Chicago

“While we are seeing brisk activity in lower price ranges, the housing market will really gain some solid traction when move-up buyers stop waiting and take advantage of this very affordable time to buy,” said REALTOR® Sheryl Grider Whitehurst, ABR, CRB, GRI, president of the Illinois Association of REALTORS® and the Development and Operations Coordinator for Traders Realty in Peoria. “This really is the moment both for buyers and those who want to sell and move on because later this year the cost of homeownership will go up. Interest rates are expected to rise above their historic lows and the cost to borrow will rise, too, with changes proposed in the lending market such as higher down payment requirements.”

Adds Whitehurst: “Market forces are steadily improving and factors for rising home sales are developing.”

As for the IAR’s data, I have noticed that the data for the year ago month (in this case April 2010) is always slightly off in the current press release compared to last year’s press release. How could that be? Isn’t the data simply the data?

For example, last year’s April 2010 sales was 1985 (in last year’s press release) but in today’s press release it says it was 1984. That is only off 1 sale, but I have seen it off more in other months. 

Outside of the data, this press release is painting a rosy picture about the next several months.

“Promising signs continue in both the housing market and in the economy. Our sales forecast shows that the housing sales volume will continue to increase for the next two months, with a monthly growth of 11 to 16 percent for Illinois and a monthly growth of 8 to 17 percent for Chicago. The forecasts indicate that the housing market will reach its 2011 peak in June,” said Dr. Geoffrey J.D. Hewings, director of the Regional Economics Applications Laboratory (REAL) of the University of Illinois. “The economy is moving in a positive direction. Both the national and the state job market continue to show solid gains of economic recovery.”

Adds Hewings: “The forecasted year-over-year sales rate in Illinois will turn positive in July, which means the effect of the homebuyer tax credit will fade out during the summer. The median prices for May, June and July are expected to be higher than April in both Chicago and Illinois.”

Will median price really rise from here over the next several months?

April Illinois Home Sales and Median Prices Tick Up from March [Illinois Association of Realtors, Press Release, May 19, 2011]

After Nearly 2-Years on the Market, This Lincoln Park Lofty Townhouse Sells: 2222 N. Racine

We last chattered about this 3-bedroom “lofty townhouse” at 2222 N. Racine in Lincoln Park in February 2011.

2222-n-racine-approved.jpg

See our prior chatter here.

Originally listed in June 2009, it had been reduced $90,000 to $599,000 by the time we chattered about it.

At least one poster had a story of a client who made an offer on the property years before at $525,000 which was never countered.

The townhouse finally sold after nearly 2-years on the market for $565,000.

If you recall, the unit was not your cookie cutter townhouse.

At 2100 square feet, it had 16-foot high ceilings in the living room along with exposed brick and some timber ceilings.

The custom kitchen had soapstone counter tops and stainless steel appliances.

There were 2 master suites with the top floor bedroom leading to the roofdeck.

Some of you thought the layout, with the three bedrooms all on different floors, narrowed the list of potential buyers.

The townhouse had a 2 car attached garage, central air and a roof deck.

Ivona Kutermankiewicz at Koenig & Strey Real Living had the listing.

Unit #13: 3 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, 2100 square feet, 2 car parking

  • Sold in May 1992 for $274,000
  • Sold in April 1995 for $325,000
  • Sold in June 1998 for $380,000
  • Sold in May 2002 for $485,000
  • Originally listed in June 2009 for $689,000
  • Reduced
  • Was listed in January 2011 for $615,000
  • Reduced
  • Was listed in February 2011 for $599,000
  • Sold in May 2011 for $565,000
  • Assessments of $281 a month (includes cable)
  • Taxes of $5120
  • Central Air
  • Washer/Dryer
  • Bedroom #1: 17×13 (third floor)
  • Bedroom #2: 16×12 (second floor)
  • Bedroom #3: 14×9 (main)

After Pending For 6 Months, This 2-Bedroom is Back on the Market: 3535 N. Reta in Lakeview

We last chattered about this 2-bedroom at 3535 N. Reta in Lakeview in October 2010.

3535-n-reta-approved.jpg

See our prior chatter here.

At that time, the price had been aggressively dropped on the unit and it was listed for $65,100 under the 2006 purchase price.

It then went under contract that November, but 6 months later it fell out of contract and now has come back on the market at the same asking price as October.

If you remember, the unit has upgraded finishes you may not find in a typical north side 2 bedroom unit including crown molding, a tray ceiling, and solid core doors.

The kitchen also doesn’t have just any stainless steel appliances, it has upgraded appliances including Subzero and Bosch plus a wine fridge.

The unit also has natural stone baths with a steam shower.

It has in-unit washer/dryer, central air and parking.

Will this unit be able to command a $400,000 price point in this market?

3535-n-reta-_2-living-room-approved.jpg

3535-n-reta-_2-kitchen-_2-approved.jpg

3535-n-reta-_2-kitchen-approved.jpg

3535-n-reta-_2-bathroom-approved.jpg

Matt Garrison at Coldwell Banker still has the listing. See more pictures and a floorplan here.

Unit #2: 2 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1 car parking, no square footage listed

  • Sold in May 2006 for $480,000
  • Originally listed in January 2010 for $475,000
  • Reduced
  • Was listed in June 2010 for $439,900 (parking included)
  • Reduced
  • Was listed in August 2010 for $429,900 (parking included)
  • Reduced
  • Was listed in October 2010 for $414,900 (parking included)
  • Under contract in November 2010
  • Fell out of contract in May 2011
  • Re-listed for $414,900 (parking included)
  • Assessments of $150 a month
  • Taxes of $6757
  • Central Air
  • Washer/Dryer in the unit
  • 2 plasma tvs included
  • Bedroom #1: 17×12
  • Bedroom #2: 12×12